Showing posts with label election of 1988. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election of 1988. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 6, 2020

Darcy Richardson, 2020 VP Alliance Party

 


Darcy Richardson was selected as the 2020 running-mate for Alliance Party nominee Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente. Richardson has a long history with third parties, both as a candidate and political historian. He is the author of A Nation Divided: The 1968 Presidential Campaign (2002) as well as several works on the history of third parties in US politics. I must say I have consulted his research several times this year in the course of constructing this blog.

Richardson's fascinating career has included working with Eugene McCarthy during the former US Senator's final two runs for the Presidency in 1988 and 1992. Darcy was the National Chair of The New Democrats during that same time period. He has been a consistent champion and activist for challenging the Republican/Democratic duopoly. In 2018 he was the Reform Party's nominee for Governor of Florida.

Darcy's blog, Uncovered Politics, is another go-to place for third party and even mainstream coverage. I've consulted his "Time Capsule" section there several times http://www.uncoveredpolitics.com/

The Alliance Party is still fairly new but has a foundation and network from older political parties that have merged. Check out their webpage at: https://www.theallianceparty.com/

[Note: The interview questions were originally posed on May 6, 2020. That was a lifetime ago but rather than start over I am going to proceed because in a weird way it is more interesting by accident]
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: Darcy, you and I are almost exactly the same age. I have long regarded the assassination of JFK on Nov. 22, 1963 and the resignation of Nixon on Aug. 9, 1974 to be dramatic event bookends of an unusually volatile era. It is also the range of time where we both politically came of age. How did life in 1963-1974 shape your current world view?

I was only seven years old the day JFK was murdered in Dallas, but I vividly remember watching our black-and-white television set that entire dark and dreary weekend.  My parents were distraught.  It all seemed so unreal, but --- as you mentioned --- the period from Kennedy's assassination on Nov. 22, 1963, to Richard M. Nixon's resignation during the Watergate scandal in Aug. 1974 had a profound impact on many in our generation.  The country lost its innocence during that tragic and tumultuous period, which included the unjust and immoral War in Vietnam, and has never really recovered.  Up 'til then, most Americans respected, if not revered, the presidency, regardless of which party occupied the Oval Office.  That's clearly no longer the case today,.

Q: Your association with former Sen. Eugene McCarthy began when you met him during his independent campaign for President in 1976. I count no less than 28 people who were identified as his running-mates that year, almost all considered stand-ins state by state. That just might be a record. He had a very low regard for the second position on a ticket, quoted in the '76 campaign as saying, "Vice-presidential candidates just clutter up the campaign. We should not ask the country to make two judgments. Everyone knows vice presidents have no influence on presidents once elected. Presidents' wives have much more influence. Perhaps we should have candidates' wives debate."  Now that you are a VP nominee yourself, would you care to comment on McCarthy's statement?

Gene was right.  That's one of the reasons I've consciously played such a low-key role in Rocky De La Fuente's campaign.  It's Rocky's campaign.  

Of course, McCarthy was separated from his wife, Abigail, when he made that crack about President's wives having more influence than the Vice President.  I'm not sure who would have had the most influence on Gene himself if he had been elected as an independent in the year of America's Bicentennial since he had also joked during that campaign that he'd probably have a different First Lady every week.  I miss him.

Q: McCarthy shocked the political world when he endorsed Reagan in 1980. When you later worked for Sen. McCarthy in 1988 and 1992, did that 1980 decision prove to be a campaign liability?

The Reagan endorsement came up a few times in 1988 when I was managing Gene's quixotic third-party bid for the White House on the Philadelphia-based Consumer Party ticket, but it was felt most profoundly when McCarthy, mounting an improbable political comeback, sought his old Senate seat from Minnesota six years earlier, in 1982.  Former Vice President Fritz Mondale's folks brought it up time and again during that year's DFL primary --- a race in which Gene was outspent by a nearly 100-1 margin.  They were relentless and unforgiving, still blaming McCarthy for Hubert Humphrey's narrow loss to Richard Nixon some fourteen years earlier.  They never forgave McCarthy, who had risked his own political career by courageously opposing LBJ and the Vietnam War during the 1968 Democratic primaries, for his belated and tepid endorsement of Humphrey, his former friend and Senate colleague, on the eve of that election.  Unlike McCarthy, Humphrey lusted after the presidency and was even willing to sell his soul by supporting Johnson's illegal war in Vietnam in pursuit of the elusive brass ring.

Q: You have been connected with a variety of political parties over the decades: the Democratic Party, Citizens Party, Consumer Party, Boston Tea Party, Reform Party, Peace and Freedom Party, just plain independent, perhaps others and now the Alliance Party. From what I can ascertain it seems like you have been pretty consistent with your progressive views through all this. Why the political party musical chairs?

My support for the above-mentioned parties --- and a few not listed here --- reflect my commitment to the idea of open politics in this country.  While the Consumer Party will always hold a special place in my heart, I haven't really been excited about a new party until now with the emergence of the centrist-oriented Alliance Party.  If we're ever going to end the hyper-partisanship and extreme polarization that's literally destroying this country and its institutions, it will have to come from an entirely new entity such as the Alliance Party.

Q: And speaking of multiple political parties, it appears the Alliance Party is just that, an alliance of numerous third parties. Can you give us the elevator speech on what the Alliance Party is all about?

The Alliance Party is the most promising new party movement to emerge in this country in decades, perhaps in my lifetime.  One and all, they’re a pretty impressive group and they certainly have the country’s best interests at heart.

Led by national chairman Jim Rex, a former college president and the last Democrat to win a statewide office in South Carolina when he was elected State Superintendent of Education in 2006, the Alliance Party is committed to restoring civility in American politics and governance.

The party's Manifesto should be required reading for every American who intends to cast a ballot in this year's presidential election.

Q: You and Alliance Party Presidential candidate Rocky De La Fuente have considerable experience running for public office and you have also been in the role of campaign manager in the past as well. What challenges and opportunities are there that distinguish the 2020 election season compared to past campaigns?

Well, first and foremost, the COVID-19 pandemic changed everything, making in-person campaigning extremely difficult and dangerous and petition drives virtually impossible.  Rocky and I initially hoped to qualify for the ballot in 35-40 states, but ended up qualifying in fewer than half that number.

Given that this election is rightfully a referendum on the reckless megalomaniac in the White House --- if he's still with us on Nov. 3rd, of course --- this is probably going to be a very lean year for America's nationally-organized third parties.  I don't think anyone, not even the anti-government Libertarian candidate, who is on the ballot in all fifty states and the District of Columbia, will come close to cracking one percent of the vote nationally.   

Hell, Steve, to be perfectly honest, I've seriously considered voting for Biden myself...this nation probably won't survive four more years of Trump.  I mean, he's already responsible for 210,000 deaths --- and counting.

As a nation, we deserve better than a self-obsessed narcissist who is willing to callously sacrifice American lives for his own re-election.  That's precisely what's happening.

Q: In terms of ballot access, where are you hoping the Rocky/Darcy ticket will appear in print, as well as being placed as certified write-ins? Looks like the Alliance Party might also have several other candidates for state and local offices?

Rocky and I are on the ballot in Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Vermont.  We also hope to be official write-in candidates in a couple of dozen states.

Rocky is also on the ballot in populous California where --- much to my chagrin --- he's paired with unhinged, pro-Trump rapper Kanye West on the American Independent Party ticket, a remnant of segregationist George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign.

Q: How would you characterize the demographics of the Alliance Party? Who are the members and where are they coming from?

The party is arguably best organized in South Carolina and Minnesota.  I think the Alliance Party membership reflects the changing nation at-large.  We're thrilled , for instance, to have nominated a first-generation Mexican-American candidate for the presidency.  We're a nation divided and most members --- at least those in leadership positions within the party--- are ex-Democrats or former Republicans who grew sick and tired of the dysfunction in Washington and believe that we can do a better, much better, job in bringing this country together.

Let's face it, we're facing twin crises --- a deadly health pandemic and a deepening economic recession that's threatening to become a full-blown depression --- and nothing is being done to alleviate the widespread suffering in our land.  Nothing is being accomplished.  Millions of our fellow citizens have lost their jobs during this pandemic and are on the verge of being evicted from their apartments or losing their homes to foreclosure and neither party is acting with any sense of urgency.

For starters, where is the promised second stimulus?  That's something every voter should ask themselves when casting their ballots between now and Election Day.

Q: What is going on with the Reform Party these days? I see you dropped the idea of pursuing their Presidential nomination.

While I have many friends in the Reform Party and was enormously proud to be the party's standard-bearer in Florida's hotly-contested 2018 gubernatorial campaign, I'm hoping the party, which admittedly has seen better days, will consider formally merging with the Alliance Party following the current campaign.

Q: Two part question--

1. Do you favor any sort of alternative voting methods of selecting people for public office such as approval voting, range voting, ranked choice voting, or sortition?


I'm a strong proponent of Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV), or what used to be called Instant Runoff Voting.  I advocated Instant Runoff Voting while briefly running for Supervisor of Elections in Duval County in a 2005 special election and Rocky and I will be among five choices on the ballot in Maine, which is instituting Ranked Choice Voting in a presidential election for the first time in American history.  It's time has come.

2. Also, would you favor having the office of Vice-President be offered on the ballot as an individual position not tied to a ticket, so we could maybe vote for a President and Vice-President from two different parties?

You mean, I could vote for Joe Biden and myself?  Hmmm.

Q: In the last three years we have seen a spike in activity of Americans denying their own humanity and rejecting the whole concept of civility, tolerance, and respect as they insult, bash, and deflect blame on others in order to elevate themselves. We see this on Twitter, Facebook, and the highest levels of government. How did we get here and how can we turn that around?

Donald Trump.  Plain and simple.  We're so polarized at this point, I'm not sure we can turn it around anytime soon.  Even if he loses, perhaps especially if he loses, Trump will continue to be a divisive and mean-spirited force in this country for the foreseeable future.

Q: Many thanks for taking part in this project. If you'd like to address any issues my questions did not cover, please feel to add your thoughts here--

Thank you, Steve.  It was my pleasure.

In closing, here are the folks I've supported at the ballot box for Vice President during my lifetime: Sally Wheaton (Eugene McCarthy, 1976); Patrick Lucey (John Anderson, 1980); Geraldine Ferraro (Walter Mondale, 1984); Florence Rice (Eugene McCarthy, 1988); James Stockdale (Ross Perot, 1992); Jo Jorgenson (Harry Browne, 1996); Winona LaDuke (Ralph Nader, 2000); Mary Alice Herbert  (Walt Brown, 2004); Thomas Knapp (Charles Jay, 2008); Cindy Sheehan (Roseanne Barr, 2012); Michael Steinberg (Rocky De La Fuente, 2016).

Many of those names, of course, are as obscure as my own.  Thanks again, Steve.

Tuesday, August 11, 2020

Vacant


Vacant

VP candidate for Independent (1984, 1988, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008)

Running mate with nominee: Robert Bryant Winn (b. 1943)
Popular vote (1984, 1988, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008): ? (0.00%)
Electoral vote (1984, 1988, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008): 0/538

The campaigns (1984, 1988, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008):

Occasionally there are Presidential candidates who are very pointed about NOT having a running-mate, and I try to cover their reasons if possible.

Robert B. Winn is a perennial Independent candidate in Arizona who has run for Governor and US Senator always as a write-in. In 1988, 1996, 2000 and 2004 he ran in the same manner for US President. In 1984 he actually made the Arizona ballot, and received 3 votes for President.

A Vietnam veteran, welder and laborer, Winn had a religious background in the Church of the Latter Day Saints and in his resume are included the intriguing but unexplained entries "Prisoner, Maricopa County, Arizona, 1992 -- Prisoner, Veterans' Affairs Hospital, Psychiatric Ward, 1970." A long time advocate and activist for independent political parties, he has written a few books and has been a prolific online author.

Although Winn did have a political platform, he deemed it "irrelevant" and made the simple fact he was not running under the banner of one of the major parties the main focus of his campaigns. Some of the reviews of his published material suggest he has a conspiratorial-minded political outlook.

So far as I can tell, Winn never had a running-mate and that seemed to be the result of a deliberate decision.

Winn made the following comment on the Third Party Watch blog regarding the election and function of the Vice-President--

 Robert B. Winn Says:
January 1st, 2008 at 1:17 am

You third party people have not fully considered what it means to be independent. Why would anyone want to be a party wannabe. As an actual independent voter, I can register as a candidate for President with the Federal Election Commission the same way George Washington did, without a vice-President running mate. Party wannabes have not yet seen what an advantage this gives the independent voter who is registered as a candidate for President.

This splits the political party vote. Who will be vice-President if an independent voter is elected President?

Well, obviously, the party vice-Presidential candidate who gets the most votes will become vice-President of the United States, since the independent voter elected President has no running mate. The duties of the vice-President are to preside over the Senate. John Nance Garner said that this job was not worth a bucket of warm spit. It should go to a political party candidate. So we will have an independent voter as President and a party politician in the vice-Presidency, even though that party’s Presidential candidate lost the election.

Match that, political party wannabes.

Actually, the Republican-Democrat Party started this anomaly by running two candidates for President in the election of 1800. Now that makes more sense. Abraham Lincoln was elected because the opposing party ran more than one candidate. Two Democrat candidates in 1860 seemed to have a good effect, until it resulted in party primaries and all the political party wannabes of today.

A real independent runs without a running mate. This running mate thing has always seemed a little suspect to me. I would rather have a Political party vice-President who just tends to his job of presiding over the Senate, except in the case of an impeachment trial, when he would be replaced by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

In any event, a political party wannabe candidate for vice-President will never defeat a political party vice-Presidential candidate because of the twelfth amendment to the Constitution. An independent vice-Presidential candidate running separate from all independent Presidential candidates could defeat a party vice-Presidential candidate, but there is no record I have seen of any independent voters running for vice-President outside of the party wannabe running mate method.


Winn also made a comment for the New York Sun along the same lines:

Robert B. Winn • Nov 13, 2007 at 08:04

The idea of a vice-Presidential running mate came from the election of 1800 when the Republican-Democrats ran two candidates for President, Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, to prevent the Federalist followers of Alexander Hamilton from gaining the office of vice-President. When the electors of the electoral college met, all of the Republican-Democrat electors voted for Jefferson and Burr, resulting in a tie vote for President. Burr, who was supposed to be running for vice-President, started campaigning for Federalist support in the House of Representatives, and it took about 38 votes in the House before Jefferson was elected.

Members of Congress considered this to be so traumatic that they passed an amendment resulting in the present day running-mate system for Presidential and vice-Presidential candidates. The way for independent voters to break the hold that parties have on these two offices is to run Presidential and vice-Presidential candidates separate, several Presidential candidates and several vice-Presidential candidates on election day.

It costs the American people billions of dollars per election to put two corrupt sets of party running mates on the ballot. Put some independent candidates on the ballot using nomination petition signatures instead of money.

Robert B. Winn


In 2019 there as an effort called Vice.run that had a mission to "reclaim our constitutional right to democratically elect the vice president by creating separate ballot lines for vice presidential candidates in the 2020 election, as per the 12th Amendment. Vice.run will secure signature pledges to use standing ballot access laws in each state to initiate this change." I had contacted this group. They agreed to be interviewed. I put in the time to research for the questions and sent them in, and that was the last I heard. Actually, some political candidates have brushed me off the same way after they gave the green light and I put in all the effort to write the questions. But in the case of Vice.run it looks like the organization just ceased to exist about the same time I sent them my list of queries.

So, just for the heck of it, here were the questions I had for Vice.run, which I will dovetail off of Mr. Winn's thought-provoking comments--

Oct 3, 2019, 7:39 AM

Vice.run was created by Mikel and David Blake, education and workforce entrepreneurs currently based in San Francisco.

Their mission, as told on their website:

"Vice.run grows from a kernel of an idea: 'All the ills of democracy can be cured by more democracy' and that the vice presidency is an undemocratic anomaly in American politics. It’s an extremely important elected office whose occupant we do not choose.

Mikel & David launched vice.run to 'act anew' to fix this anomaly and reinstate the vice presidency as a democratically elected position. Vice.run’s goal is to create a vice presidential ballot line in the 2020 election in all 50 states.

Since national elections are managed at the state-level, we have state-level goals and are growing our state-level operations. Our very first organizing effort is collecting ballot-access pledges calling on states to create a separate ballot line for the vice president."

And here is what I would call their thesis statement:

"The Constitution gives the American people the right to choose the vice president of the United States. That right was taken from us by the party ballot. That lack of democracy has corrupted the office, turning it into a presidential lap dog, instead of a representative of 'We the People.'

It’s time for that approach to change. It’s time to reclaim the vice presidency for the American people. It’s time for us to elect the vice president.'"

David Blake, co-founder of vice.run

https://vice.run/

--------------------------------------------------------------

Q: What exactly provided the spark for this movement? Were the Blakes at all politically active before vice.run was created?

Q: If the presentation of a party ticket is the result of custom rather than legality, why has this been allowed to exist so long without being challenged? Or have there been other efforts similar to yours in the past?

Q: Devil's advocate here. Shouldn't the parties have a right to select their own solid ticket?

Q: Part of the 12th Amendment states "The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves ..." -- This has never really been tested. But in your model it could happen by chance. Then what?

Q: Do the recent efforts to eliminate the Electoral College complicate or help your mission in any way?

Q: In every political process there always seems to be an opportunity for mischief. In 1860 there was an alleged plot to deadlock the presidential vote in the House in the event of no electoral winner, and with the absence of a President the Senate would elect the pro-slavery running mate Joseph Lane of the Constitutional Democratic Party who would then ascend to the presidency. Have you identified any other sort of loopholes in the system regarding Vice-Presidents and what can be done about them?

Q: I recall that after the JFK assassination the US was without a Vice-President and then the 25th Amendment was enacted, allowing the sitting President to appoint a new VP, which was later the case with Gerald Ford in 1973 and Nelson Rockefeller in 1974. Should that process also be changed and if so, how?

Q: Half of the states have a baked-in system, part of election law, where the Governor and Lt. Governor are elected as a ticket. Do you have plans to try and change that as well?

Q: What part of the political spectrum are you getting the most positive response from? Have you been able to determine the demographics of your support? Do you find yourself building alliances with other organizations in this process and who are they?

Q: Are you experiencing any pushback and if so, from where?

Q: Gone are the days when Wilson's VP, Thomas Marshall said, "Once there were two brothers. One ran away to sea, the other was elected Vice President, and nothing was ever heard of either of them again." Some modern VPs have been able to involve themselves, basically under the public radar, in schemes that had enormous consequences for our country-- for example the VPs Nixon and Cheney getting their hands dirty with clandestine foreign operations and performing end runs around due process. How does your model make the Vice-President more accountable?

Q: How goes the battle with the state by state effort? Do you have benchmarks set for 2020? 2024?

Q: Is the vice.run project giving anyone in the central team ideas for broader political ambitions? Can we expect to see any of you running for office?

Q: Thanks very much for taking the time to answer my questions. Anything you would like to add?

Election history: none

Other occupations: none

Notes:
Winn was a Republican until 1973, when he left the Party due to Watergate.

Saturday, July 4, 2020

Robert Leo Beck




 Above: The claim ; Below: The source


Below: Daily Herald (Provo, Utah), Sept. 14, 1989





Robert Leo Beck, June 5, 1934 (Centerfield, Utah) - February 12, 2013 (Yuma, Ariz.)

VP candidate for Unaffiliated (2000)

Running mate with nominee: Louie Gene Youngkeit (1936-2003)
Popular vote: 161 (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Louie G. Youngkeit of Provo, Utah was making his third run for the Presidency in 2000. Although he had previously made campaigns in 1988 and 1996, this was the first one where a running-mate was named.

Prior to his national runs, Youngkeit had been in the news in the mid-1970s for being active with the American Party, then later in the late 1970s for being one of the claimants to the fortune of the Howard Hughes estate. Youngkeit and his mother produced a photo of Hughes and Noah Dietrich they said was taken by their now deceased father/husband, but it seems the snapshot might have actually been lifted from Dietrich's 1972 book, Howard : the Amazing Mr. Hughes.

In 1988 Youngkeit made it to the ballot (without a Vice-President) in Utah where he finished with 372 votes, 0.06% of the state total. During that campaign he said he and his brother were tortured by the CIA in a theater in Anaheim, Calif. in 1948 and it was connected to the 1963 assassination of JFK. He also said many of the other Presidential candidates had been "bought" by the Contra rebels.

In 1996 he ran as write-in candidate, earning 19 votes. The Wall Street Journal carried this short blurb about his effort:

"I'm hoping that Perot will name me his vice president," Louie Youngkeit tells me outside the Long Beach Convention Center. Anything's possible, but Mr. Youngkeit's only qualification seems to be his obsession with Howard Hughes. He hands me a monograph he and his mother wrote in 1978, which claims that in 1949 Mr. Youngkeit's father looked after Hughes's car for a few days and allowed Hughes to drill an oil well on his property. In repayment for these kindnesses, the monograph says, Hughes promised to leave half his estate to the younger Mr. Youngkeit. When Hughes died in 1976, Mr. Youngkeit, to his dismay, was not named in the will. The monograph draws the obvious conclusion: Someone altered the will after Hughes's death. "This is the reason JFK was assassinated," Mr. Youngkeit adds, inexplicably.

When Youngkeit announced he was running in 2000, the Our Campaigns website commented:

Youngkeit -- a rather eccentric candidate -- claims he is "the Heir Apparent of the [late billionaire] Howard R. Hughes' Estate." You see, Hughes was secretly murdered in 1970 -- and his body was frozen for several years until his death was announced in 1976 -- and JFK was assassinated in 1963 because of Hughes's money -- and it was also the reason for the Watergate break-in -- and President Bush and Hillary Clinton are part of the scheming -- all that and lots more can be found in Youngkeit's conspiracy theory (see his website for more details). As a write-in candidate in the 1996 Presidential race, Youngkeit earned only 19 votes. Having secured ballot status in his homestate of Utah, he is guaranteed to score a better performance in 2000. Youngkeit's Vice Presidential runningmate is Robert L. Beck.

In a 2000 interview, Youngkeit told a reporter, "I want to be the first LDS President of the United States ... I am standing on the principles I have learned as a member of the LDS Church ... The church teaches us to 'choose the right,' that's the most important thing to remember – presidential campaign or not."

His brother-in-law Robert Leo Beck of Yuma, Ariz. was his VP choice. "He is an impressive person," Youngkeit said. I could not ascertain any campaign activity undertaken by Beck.

On the ballot only in Utah, the Youngkeit/Beck ticket placed 9th out of 9 with 0.02% of the state vote. In the event of their victory, Beck would have assumed the Presidency upon the death of Youngkeit, May 12, 2003.

Election history: none

Other occupations: US Marines

Buried: ?

Notes:
Brush with Fame. Rival Hughes claimant Melvin Dummar was a regular guest at the Clown Motel in
 Tonopah, Nev. When I stayed there awhile back I was hoping to run into him but the manager said
 my timing was off. Dummar has since died.
Brush with Fame 2: When Hughes was hiding in the Bayshore Hotel in Vancouver, BC in 1972, I
 recall visiting that city and seeing the top floors with all the drapes pulled and men in business suits
 patrolling the balconies.

Sunday, March 29, 2020

Marlin Dale Thacker


 Jerry Carroll

Marlin Dale Thacker, October 6, 1933 (Fyffe, Ala.) - May 1, 1993 (Crossville, Ala.)

VP candidate for Independent (aka No Party) (1988, 1992)

Running mate with nominee (1988, 1992): Jerry Leon Carroll (b. 1945)
Popular vote (1988): 13 (0.00%)
Popular vote (1992): 0 (0.00%)
Electoral vote (1988, 1992): 0/538

The campaign (1988):

The perennial candidate who calls himself Jerry "Mr. President" Carroll first ran for President in 1980 as near as I can tell. He once expressed a desire to "become crowned emperor of Earth by all the peoples of Earth." The former Amway salesman was living in Lodi, Calif. in 1988.

It is little difficult to decipher his platform but it seems he might be something of a Christian nationalist and survivalist. Apparently he lays claim to being the "mole" that exposed Jim Jones' People Temple cult. He also said he was, for two years, the Public Relations Man for the National Security Agency [!!!]

His running-mate Marlin D. Thacker had run for President in the Democratic Party primaries in 1980 and 1984 in which he expressed admiration for FDR's massive public works programs. Thacker lived in Crossville, Ala., a licensed veterinarian who happened to be working in an egg processing plant.

The Carroll/Thacker ticket were registered write-ins in California, where they gained 17 votes.

The campaign (1992):

Carroll was simultaneously running for the US Senate in California as a write-in candidate in 1992. He garnered 37 votes in that one. Meanwhile, Thacker had once again started the campaign season as a candidate in the Democratic Party primaries.

Carroll was a registered in write-in, sometimes with Thacker as his VP, in Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Carroll's native state of Kansas,  Missouri, Montana, and Utah. On Election Day they had zero popular votes in every one of them. Yes. Zero. Nada, Zilch. I'm talkin' crickets.

In the event they had won, Thacker would have died just a few months into his term, May 1, 1993.

Election history: 
1977? - DeKalb County (Ala.) Sheriff - defeated
1980 - Democratic nomination for US President - defeated
1984 - Democratic nomination for US President - defeated
1992 - Democratic nomination for US President - defeated

Other occupations: US Air Force (Korea), egg processing plant worker, licensed veterinarian

Buried: Beulah Baptist Cemetery (Fyffe, Ala.)

Notes:
Described as "a country hayseed in a pickup truck" in 1983 by his rival Democratic primary
 candidate Richard A. Grayson.

Saturday, March 21, 2020

George David Ormsby






George David Ormsby, November 24, 1916 (Village Green-Green Ridge, Penn.) - May 20, 2013 (Aston, Penn.)

VP candidate for Prohibition Party (aka Independent) (1988, 1992)

Running mate with nominee (1988, 1992): Earl F. Dodge (1932-2007)
Popular vote (1988): 8,002 (0.01%)
Popular vote (1992): 961 (0.00%)
Electoral vote (1988, 1992): 0/538

The campaign (1988):

The 1987 Prohibition Party convention selected Earl Dodge for his second Presidential run, with Pennsylvania plumber George Ormsby as his running-mate.

The Party platform by this time had Dodge's extremely conservative views baked in. In 1988 a new plank was introduced concerning Social Security:

 The present Social Security system is discriminatory, actuarially unsound, and destructive of individual initiative. We will reform the system and will: 1. Allow workers the option of enrolling in private retirement plans in lieu of paying Social Security taxes; (2) Place the system on a sound actuarial basis; and (3) Restore Social Security to its original purpose by placing the Medicare and Medicaid programs in a separate system.

Dodge told a reporter in Oct. 1988: "Being a third-party candidate is like seeing your mother-in-law drive your Cadillac over a cliff-- you have mixed feelings about it ... If I only got one vote, I'd feel it was a great honor. It's what I believe in. I'd pay for the privilege to do this. But it's frustrating. It takes most of your money and energy just to get through the jungle of election laws. The media, by and large, ignore us, particularly at the national level, or they treat you like an eccentric for not being a Democrat or a Republican."

On the ballot in four states, the final percentages were: Colorado 0.34%, Arkansas 0.16%, Tennessee 0.11%, New Mexico 0.05%.

This would be the last Presidential election (as of March, 2020) where the Prohibition Party would earn as much as 0.01% of the popular vote. From 1992-2016 it would be 0.00% in every election.

The campaign (1992):

The Dodge/Ormsby ticket was nominated for another run, which was pretty much ignored by the media. On Election Day the Prohibition Party experienced their worst results ever in a Presidential race.

On the ballot in three states, their percentages were: Arkansas 0.05%, New Mexico and Tennessee 0.02% each.

But wait, the lowest point is yet to come.

Election history: none

Other occupations: mechanic, Seabee WWII, plumber, President of the National Council of the United States International Organization of Good Templars

Buried: Mount Hope Cemetery (Aston, Penn.)

Notes:
Presbyterian
Train enthusiast
Voted Republican by default if no Prohibition Party candidates were on the ballot.
"I spent three years in the Navy and didn't drink at all, so it can be done. I must confess I learned to drink a lot of coffee"--George Ormsby.

Friday, March 20, 2020

Andre Verne Marrou






Andre Verne Marrou, December 4, 1938 (Nixon, Tex.) -

VP candidate for Libertarian Party (aka Independent) (1988)

Running mate with nominee: Ronald Ernest Paul (b. 1935)
Popular vote: 431,750 (0.47%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Ron Paul interrupted his career as a Republican Congressman from Texas to detour for a few years as a member of the Libertarian Party before returning the major party fold. There were several candidates for the LP nomination at the 1987 convention in (Washington State trivia alert!!!) Seattle, but the main competitors were Rep. Paul and Indigenous American activist Russell Means, neither one being products of the LP. The media tried to simplify the differences between the two as Paul being the Ring-wing and Means being the Left-wing of the Party, or the Establishment conservative carpetbagger vs. the social justice Libertarian. In the end, Paul won the day.

VP nominee Andre Marrou who was in fact more of a LP stalwart than either Paul or Means had the distinction of being the very first member of the Libertarian Party to be elected to a state legislature. He served in the Alaska State House from 1985-1987. As a politico here in Washington at the time I recall how Marrou's election up north was a milestone which upset more Republicans than Democrats. Marrou's achievement represented how a significant number of Goldwater Republicans (like my father) were totally turned off by Reagan's embrace of the evangelicals and how the President's party allowed the deficit to skyrocket. Iran-Contra didn't help the Republican image either.

And speaking of the Iran-Contra scandal there was a double-edged question regarding President Reagan's involvement where either answer was probably impeachable. Either he knew about it, or, he was not minding the store and allowed criminal activities to take place under his watch through gross mismanagement and incompetence. Either way, it was bad. The same standard could be said for Ron Paul. Newsletters released under his name that contained racist and Right-wing conspiracy ideas during this same time period had to be addressed. And, like Reagan, Paul's involvement was a double-edged question with either answer being a negative one.

But on the positive side Paul, having been a Republican member of Congress, did bring a sense of legitimate federal experience which combined with Marrou's real-life actual election as a Libertarian presented a third party ticket with two people who had bonafide experience in elected public office. That is rare in American minor party politics and it a was a historic first for the Libertarian Party.

An in-house survey by David Nolan was sent to Ron Paul, Russell Means, and VP designate Marrou in 1987. The questions themselves are as revealing about the 1987-1988 Libertarian Party mindset as the answers. Here are some of the questions and answers between Nolan and Marrou.

Nolan: Every candidate has two or three "core issues" which he or she emphasizes in his or her campaign. What issues to you plan to stress, and how will you tie them together into a coherent package?

Marrou: I do not have any "core issues" other than the obscene size and cost of government, which leads to interference with private lives. Cutting government as much as possible, as quickly as possible, is my overwhelming concern.

Nolan: Do you have any disagreements with any planks in the LP platform? (Check to be sure!) If you do, what will you do when asked about your stand on these issues?

Marrou: So far as I know, I have no disagreement with the current national LP platform.  A few years back, there was a plank on children's rights which lead to the silly conclusion that a four-year-old is qualified to do everything an adult can do. Although children should have their civil rights protected, the debate as to what constitutes an adult will, I'm sure, continue. As to abortion, I am pro-choice at least up to the point of natural viability--that is, where the fetus can live outside the womb naturally without artificial help. Government certainly should protect citizens of whatever age, but the point at which a fetus becomes a "citizen" will continue to be argued, since it a moral/religious issue. There may be some agreement that government should not be involved during the first six months of pregnancy, approximately the point of natural viability.

Nolan: As you may know, I [Nolan] have long advocated that our candidates for President and Vice-President abandon any pretense that they are "running to win," and instead use their campaigns to generate support for our Congressional candidates. What is  your  strategic vision for this campaign?

Marrou: As the LP's VP nominee, my main effort will go into building the LP nationwide. While the Presidential nominee is going to the big cities and being on TV, I plan to hit the smaller cities and towns, attending rallies and signing up members in addition to raising funds for my campaign and the local or state LP. In so doing, I would seek out the local press--printed and electronic--for interviews to spread the LP philosphy on a local level. Of course, I would participate in whatever available debates among the VP candidates may occur.

Nolan: ... To what extent will you "clear" your campaign material through the party's Review Committee to make sure it conforms with the party's official positions?

Marrou: I was not aware that the national LP required or even suggested that my campaign material be "cleared" through the Review Committee. That smacks of the fealty oaths so beloved by the Republicans. Although I have nothing to hide, and consider myself as "pure" a Libertarian as anybody, nonetheless submitting my material to someone else is distasteful. In fact, in 1984 I refused $1,000 from the LP of Anchorage because they wanted control of my advertising. This holier-than-thou attitude is destructive and somewhat adolescent, amounting to one of the self-wrought plagues of the LP. If anyone should be passing upon the "libertarianness" of any material, it should be me, since I have explained and defended the philosophy under the most adverse circumstances during the last two years in the Alaska Legislature. In addition, I served on the Platform Committee of the Alaska LP for three years, including one year as Chairman. I know the LP philosophy upside-down and backwards. It is natural to me-- I don't have to memorize the platform.

Nolan: Some people have suggested that our candidates might find it appropriate to endorse other parties' candidates for lower offices in cases where no Libertarian is running, and another party's candidate is substantially in agreement with our positions. Under what circumstances, if any, would you make such endorsements?

Marrou: Under no circumstances should the LP endorse candidates of another party, regardless of the situation. If these other candidates are "substantially" libertarian, then they should run as Libertarians. In fact, the By-Laws of the Alaska LP prohibit such endorsements, and the national LP by-laws should too, if they don't already.

In Oct. 1987 Morrou told a reporter he estimated the ticket would receive between 2 million to 12 million votes.

Some electioneering quotes from Morrou according to the newspapers--

From our standpoint, we'd do best if Jesse Jackson and Pat Robertson are the nominees because I don't think people want to see a preacher in the White House.

Most people are Libertarians and they just don't know it. They want lower taxes, less government interference and more freedom. Democrats and Republicans offer the opposite. It's just a matter of time before our ideas catch on.

Generally, with the exception of the coastal states, the further west you go in the U.S., things get better and better. We have the Old West tradition-- taking care of yourself.

If Jefferson were alive today, standing here, he'd be telling you exactly what I'm telling you.

For all intents and purposes the Democrats are left-wing socialists and the Republicans are right-wing socialists.


Some journalists seemed more obsessed with Marrou's French surname and his facial hair than they were with his policies.

Although their national finish of 0.47% seems minuscule, their result was nearly the total of all the other third parties combined. It was also their second highest percentage of their five Presidential elections up to that point. On the ballot in 46 states + DC they continued to be seen as a party of the Far West with their strongest percentages in: Alaska 2.74%, Montana 1.38%, Idaho 1.30%, Kansas 1.26%, Oregon 1.23%, Utah 1.16%, Wyoming 1.15%, Arizona 1.14%, Colorado 1.13%, Nevada 1.01%, and New Hampshire 1.00%.

In Washington State, where Dukakis barely won, one could make an argument that the Paul/Marrou ticket were the spoilers. Their 2.74% result in Alaska would be the last time the Libertarians cracked 2.00% in a state Presidential vote until 2012.

By the next election in 1992 Paul endorsed Republican Pat Buchanan in the primaries. Marrou would go on to be the Presidential nominee for the LP and generate his own controversies which I will cover when I profile his VP running-mate.

Election history:
1982 - Alaska House of Representatives (Libertarian Party) - defeated
1985-1987 - Alaska House of Representatives (Libertarian Party)
1986 - Alaska House of Representatives (Libertarian Party) - defeated
1987 - Libertarian Party nomination for US President - defeated
1992 - US President (Libertarian Party) - defeated

Other occupations: real estate

Notes:
"Liberals want the government to be your Mommy. Conservatives want government to be your
 Daddy. Libertarians want it to treat you like an adult."--Andre Marrou
"Republicans don't want anyone having more fun than they do, and the Democrats don't want anyone
 making more money than they do. Libertarians want you to make money and have fun."--Andre
 Marrou
Grandparents came from France.
Moved to Nevada after his 1986 defeat in Alaska.

Thursday, March 19, 2020

Jim Plunkett


Jim Plunkett

VP candidate for Independent (1988)

Running mate with nominee: Robert Arnold Locke (b. 1948)
Popular vote: less than 270 (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

The independent ticket of Bobby Locke and Jim Plunkett were certified write-ins on the Texas ballot. I'll take a guess that Bobby Locke was not the golfer or baseball player (two sports figures of the general era with the same name) but instead a perennial candidate in Texas with the full name of Robert Arnold Locke. He is still active today and also known as Robert "Star" Locke.

Locke's political affiliations have changed a lot over the years = Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, and apparently in this election, Independent. In 1988 he filed with the FEC as a Democrat. It appears he falls into the very conservative side of the political spectrum.

Since the media failed to really cover Locke's campaign I cannot ascertain if his running mate Jim Plunkett is the same as the legendary football player, or, like Locke himself, there is some guy in Texas who shares a name with a famous athlete.

Texas recorded 270 write-in votes for President in 1988, so the Locke/Plunkett ticket could be found somewhere in that figure.

Election history: ?

Other occupations: ?

Notes:
Locke lived in Austin at the time he filed with the FEC.

Barbara R. Taylor


Barbara R. Taylor, January 1, 1922 - January 6, 2012

VP candidate for New Alliance Party (1988)

Running mate with nominee: Lenora Fulani (b. 1950)
Popular vote: 5,139 (0.01%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

In 1988 Lenora Fulani was the nominee for the New Alliance Party. She managed to achieve the nearly impossible task of gaining ballot status in all 50 states + DC. In some cases the NAP worked with already existing third parties such as the Solidarity Party and United Citizens Party. In California they tried but failed to take over the Peace and Freedom Party and in the process temporarily derailed the PFP for that election year.

Meanwhile, Dennis L. Serrette the NAP Presidential nominee for 1984, denounced the Party as a toxic cult during the 1988 election season. This point of view would be shared by several in the cultbusting community.

Fulani had eight running-mates in 1988, stating "If we got elected, we'd figure it out." On the New Jersey ballot her VP was Barbara R. Taylor, who ran the Barbara Taylor School, located in the Harlem section of New York. Since both Fulani and Taylor were residents of New York, there would have been a Constitutional problem in the event they had won.

The Barbara Taylor School began in 1985 and became a hub and laboratory involving several figures from this psychological/political movement based on the work of Fred Newman. New Alliance Party philosophy apparently filtered into the curriculum. In addition to running for Vice-President, Taylor was also running for a seat in the US House that year-- first in the Democratic primary then in the general under the NAP banner. Even though she ran as a Democrat in the primary, she told a reporter in 1988, "The two party system really operates as one. The Republicans have never made any bones about what they represent. The Democrats make this hype about working for minorities, but they don't."

In 1987 Fulani said the NAP was prepared to endorse Jesse Jackson in the event he won the Democratic nomination, but in case he didn't her campaign was forging ahead.

The NAP platform included national health care, support for AIDS victims, recognition of Native American treaty rights, stronger environmental regulations, a freeze on military spending, ending aid to South Africa-Contras in Central America-Israel, support of pro-choice laws, support of public transportation.

Nationally Fulani gained 217,221 votes (0.24%) and placed 4th, a truly impressive and historic finish on many levels-- for openers, Fulani was the first African American woman to be listed on every US ballot. The Fulani/Taylor ticket received 0.17% of the popular vote in New Jersey.

Election history:
1988 - US House of Representatives (NY) (New Alliance Party) - defeated
1989 - Manhattan Borough President (NY) (Democratic) - primary - defeated
1989 - Manhattan Borough President (NY) (New Alliance Party) - defeated
1992 - New York Assembly (Democratic) - primary - defeated
1992 - New York Assembly (New Alliance Party) - defeated
2000 - New York Assembly (Independence Party of New York) - defeated

Other occupations: teacher

Notes:
Incumbent and winner of the 1988 House race was Charles Rangel.
The Barbara Taylor School ran until 1997.

Michael Pellettiere


Michael Pellettiere

VP candidate for Independent (aka New Alliance Party) (1988)

Running mate with nominee: Lenora Fulani (b. 1950)
Popular vote: 3,806 (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

In 1988 Lenora Fulani was the nominee for the New Alliance Party. She managed to achieve the nearly impossible task of gaining ballot status in all 50 states + DC. In some cases the NAP worked with already existing third parties such as the Solidarity Party and United Citizens Party. In California they tried but failed to take over the Peace and Freedom Party and in the process temporarily derailed the PFP for that election year.

Meanwhile, Dennis L. Serrette the NAP Presidential nominee for 1984, denounced the Party as a toxic cult during the 1988 election season. This point of view would be shared by several in the cultbusting community.

Fulani had eight running-mates in 1988, stating "If we got elected, we'd figure it out." Her VP who was on the Kansas ballot only was Michael Pellettiere, who lived in Queens, NY. Since both Fulani and Pellettiere lived in New York, there would have been a Constitutional problem in the event of their electoral victory.

Pellettiere, who was already active with the NAP, had some connection with the Barbara Taylor School in Harlem, where he was known as "Mr. P." Taylor herself was Fulani's running-mate in New Jersey.

In 1987 Fulani said the NAP was prepared to endorse Jesse Jackson in the event he won the Democratic nomination, but in case he didn't her campaign was forging ahead.

The NAP platform included national health care, support for AIDS victims, recognition of Native American treaty rights, stronger environmental regulations, a freeze on military spending, ending aid to South Africa-Contras in Central America-Israel, support of pro-choice laws, support of public transportation.

Nationally Fulani gained 217,221 votes (0.24%) and placed 4th, a truly impressive and historic finish on many levels-- for openers, Fulani was the first African American woman to be listed on every US ballot. The Fulani/Pellettiere team earned 0.38% of the popular vote in Kansas.

Election history: none

Other occupations: ?

Notes:
More data is welcome

B. Kwaku Duren



B. Kwaku Duren, April 14, 1943 (Beckley, W. Va.) -

VP candidate for Independent (aka New Alliance Party) (1988)

Running mate with nominee: Lenora Fulani (b. 1950)
Popular vote: 31,180 (0.03%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

In 1988 Lenora Fulani was the nominee for the New Alliance Party. She managed to achieve the nearly impossible task of gaining ballot status in all 50 states + DC. In some cases the NAP worked with already existing third parties such as the Solidarity Party and United Citizens Party. In California they tried but failed to take over the Peace and Freedom Party and in the process temporarily derailed the PFP for that election year.

In the 1988 election the Peace and Freedom Party seemed to be in a bit of disarray as it tried to fend off a takeover attempt by the New Alliance Party. The PFP appeared to have been seriously split and a third of the delegates walked out of the convention in Oakland. This was a rare election where the PFP did not appear on the Presidential ballot in California. NAP leader Lenora Fulani and Internationalist Workers Party figure Herb Lewin both claimed the nomination but when they filed with the California Secretary of State the election officials refused to recognize either one as the legitimate Presidential selection.

Lewin claimed victory but Fulani said she was nominated at a "parallel convention" in a nearby hotel.

It seems the PFP party officials made the request not to list either one on the ballot. Party chair and 1980 presidential nominee Maureen Smith told the press the nomination process "never got off on a legal start" since so many delegates were not credentialed. There had been talk of officially making Eugene McCarthy the PFP choice and it seems some negotiating did take place but consensus was never attained.

Meanwhile, Dennis L. Serrette the New Alliance Party Presidential nominee for 1984, denounced the NAP as a toxic cult during the 1988 election season. This point of view would be shared by several in the cultbusting community.

Fulani had eight running-mates in 1988, stating "If we got elected, we'd figure it out." Her VP who was on the California ballot only was B. Kwaku Duren, one of the few 1988 Fulani ticket-sharers who had already established a prior public political identity independent of the NAP.

In the 1970s Duren was an ex-convict who was already on the path of seeking social change through community action when his sister was shot and killed by a California State Highway Patrol officer during what should have been a normal traffic stop. This seemed to sharpen his resolve as he joined the Black Panther Party and earned a degree in law. Always a controversial figure, Duren was making a second try for a seat in the US House as a member of the Peace and Freedom Party at the same time he was running for Vice-President with the New Alliance Party.

In 1987 Fulani said the NAP was prepared to endorse Jesse Jackson in the event he won the Democratic nomination, but in case he didn't her campaign was forging ahead.

The NAP platform included national health care, support for AIDS victims, recognition of Native American treaty rights, stronger environmental regulations, a freeze on military spending, ending aid to South Africa-Contras in Central America-Israel, support of pro-choice laws, support of public transportation.

Nationally Fulani gained 217,221 votes (0.24%) and placed 4th, a truly impressive and historic finish on many levels-- for openers, Fulani was the first African American woman to be listed on every US ballot. The Fulani/Duren ticket received 0.32% of the popular vote in California, so it was better than Fulani's national average.

Election history:
1986 - US House of Representatives (Calif.) (Peace and Freedom Party) - defeated
1988 - US House of Representatives (Calif.) (Peace and Freedom Party) - defeated
1990 - California Insurance Commissioner (Peace and Freedom Party) - primary - defeated
1992 - US House of Representatives (Calif.) (Peace and Freedom Party) - defeated
2013 - Mayor of Compton, Calif. (Nonpartisan) - primary - defeated

Other occupations: attorney, author, teacher, co-chair of the Coalition Against Police Abuse, Coordinator of the Southern California Chapter of the Black Panther Party, President of the Union of Legal Services Workers of Los Angeles, Executive Director of Community Services Unlimited, founding member and chairman of the New African American Vanguard Movement

Notes:
Winner of the 1986 and 1988 races was Merv Dymally.
One of his fellow candidates in the 2013 race was Rodney Allen Rippy.
Birth name: Robert Donaldson Duren.

Wednesday, March 18, 2020

Harold Franklin Moore


Harold Franklin Moore, August 6, 1945 - December 1, 1989 (Portland, Ore.)

VP candidate for Independent (aka New Alliance Party) (1988)

Running mate with nominee: Lenora Fulani (b. 1950)
Popular vote: 6,487 (0.01%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

In 1988 Lenora Fulani was the nominee for the New Alliance Party. She managed to achieve the nearly impossible task of gaining ballot status in all 50 states + DC. In some cases the NAP worked with already existing third parties such as the Solidarity Party and United Citizens Party. In California they tried but failed to take over the Peace and Freedom Party and in the process temporarily derailed the PFP for that election year.

Meanwhile, Dennis L. Serrette the NAP Presidential nominee for 1984, denounced the Party as a toxic cult during the 1988 election season. This point of view would be shared by several in the cultbusting community.

Fulani had eight running-mates in 1988, stating "If we got elected, we'd figure it out." Her running-mate in Oregon was Harold F. Moore.

Moore, who confessed to "a long and complicated criminal history" including long periods of incarceration, was a Portland, Oregon-based HIV-infected Gay activist who had originally been involved in the Democratic Party supporting Dukakis in a lukewarm way but was won over by Fulani and the New Alliance Party partly as a result of the Democratic failure to adequately address the AIDS crisis. Moore told the press, "I used to feel isolated" but thanks to the NAP "the hole inside me is gone." Three months after joining the Party, he found himself in the position of VP nominee on the Oregon ballot.

It is important to remember that during both of his terms, President Reagan never addressed the AIDS pandemic in public.

Not all Gay activists were so enthralled by the NAP's outreach program and a considerable body of critical literature exists.

In 1987 Fulani said the NAP was prepared to endorse Jesse Jackson in the event he won the Democratic nomination, but in case he didn't her campaign was forging ahead.

The NAP platform included national health care, support for AIDS victims, recognition of Native American treaty rights, stronger environmental regulations, a freeze on military spending, ending aid to South Africa-Contras in Central America-Israel, support of pro-choice laws, support of public transportation.

Nationally Fulani gained 217,221 votes (0.24%) and placed 4th, a truly impressive and historic finish on many levels-- for openers, Fulani was the first African American woman to be listed on every US ballot. The Fulani/Moore ticket finished with 0.54% of the popular vote in Oregon, the 4th best showing for Fulani among the 50 states + DC.

Election history: none

Other occupations: journalist for Gay publications

Buried: ?

Notes:
Would have died in office if elected.

Tuesday, March 17, 2020

Rafael MĆ©ndez



Rafael MĆ©ndez, b. ca1950

VP candidate for New Alliance Party (1988)

Running mate with nominee: Lenora Fulani (b. 1950)
Popular vote: 9,445 (0.01%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

In 1988 Lenora Fulani was the nominee for the New Alliance Party. She managed to achieve the nearly impossible task of gaining ballot status in all 50 states + DC. In some cases the NAP worked with already existing third parties such as the Solidarity Party and United Citizens Party. In California they tried but failed to take over the Peace and Freedom Party and in the process temporarily derailed the PFP for that election year.

Meanwhile, Dennis L. Serrette the NAP Presidential nominee for 1984, denounced the Party as a toxic cult during the 1988 election season. This point of view would be shared by several in the cultbusting community.

Fulani had eight running-mates in 1988, stating "If we got elected, we'd figure it out." Rafael MĆ©ndez, a Fred Newman disciple of Puerto Rican heritage, was on the ballot with Fulani in New Mexico and Texas. He was also running for US Congress in New York as a member of the NAP. His general pattern was to initially run for public office in the primaries as a Democrat, then as a member of the NAP in the main election.

In 1987 Fulani said the NAP was prepared to endorse Jesse Jackson in the event he won the Democratic nomination, but in case he didn't her campaign was forging ahead.

The NAP platform included national health care, support for AIDS victims, recognition of Native American treaty rights, stronger environmental regulations, a freeze on military spending, ending aid to South Africa-Contras in Central America-Israel, support of pro-choice laws, support of public transportation.

I could not find any evidence MĆ©ndez actually campaigned in either of the states where he ran as Fulani's VP. Since Fulani and MĆ©ndez were apparently both residents of New York, there would have been a Constitutional problem in the event they had won.

Nationally Fulani gained 217,221 votes (0.24%) and placed 4th, a truly impressive and historic finish on many levels-- for openers, Fulani was the first African American woman to be listed on every US ballot. The Fulani/MĆ©ndez ticket finished with 0.43% in New Mexico and 0.13% in Texas.

Election history:
1985 - New York City Comptroller (Democratic) - primary - defeated
1985 - New York City Comptroller (New Alliance Party) - defeated
1986 - Lt. Governor of New York (New Alliance Party) - defeated
1987 - Bronx Borough President (NY) (Democratic) - primary - defeated
1988 - US House of Representatives (NY) (New Alliance Party) - defeated
1989 - New York City Council President (Democratic) - primary - defeated
1989 - New York City Council President (New Alliance Party) - defeated
1991 - New York City Council (Democratic) - primary - defeated
1991 - New York City Council (New Alliance Party) - defeated
1992 - US House of Representatives (NY) (Democratic) - primary - defeated
1992 - US House of Representatives (NY) (New Alliance Party) - defeated
1993 - New York City Council (New Alliance Party) - defeated

Other occupations: assistant professor of psychology at Bronx Community College, author, air traffic controller in the Vetnam War, roofer, security guard, truck driver, actor

Notes:
One of the other Democrats defeated in the 1992 primary was Stephen Joshua Solarz.
Co-editor, with Lois Holzman of Psychological Investigations: A Clinician's Guide to Social Therapy
  (2003)
Ph.D. in psychology, Boston University 1983.
Later became involved with the Independence Party of New York.

Monday, March 16, 2020

Wynonia Brewington Burke





Wynonia Brewington Burke, June, 1950 (Sampson County, NC) -

VP candidate for New Alliance Party (1988)

Running mate with nominee: Lenora Fulani (b. 1950)
Popular vote: 11,888 (0.01%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

In 1988 Lenora Fulani was the nominee for the New Alliance Party. She managed to achieve the nearly impossible task of gaining ballot status in all 50 states + DC. In some cases the NAP worked with already existing third parties such as the Solidarity Party and United Citizens Party. In California they tried but failed to take over the Peace and Freedom Party and in the process temporarily derailed the PFP for that election year.

Meanwhile, Dennis L. Serrette the NAP Presidential nominee for 1984, denounced the Party as a toxic cult during the 1988 election season. This point of view would be shared by several in the cultbusting community.

Fulani had eight running-mates in 1988, stating "If we got elected, we'd figure it out." Wynonia Brewington Burke, a resident of Arizona but originally from North Carolina was on the ballot with Fulani in four states. Burke's parents had Cherokee and Coharie tribal heritage, making her the third Indigenous American woman to be nominated for Vice-President in US history. She was usually identified in the media as part of the Coharie community.

Although in 1988 Burke was also running as a member of the NAP for a position in the Arizona State House, she still went out of state to campaign for the national ticket.

In 1987 Fulani said the NAP was prepared to endorse Jesse Jackson in the event he won the Democratic nomination, but in case he didn't her campaign was forging ahead.

The NAP platform included national health care, support for AIDS victims, recognition of Native American treaty rights, stronger environmental regulations, a freeze on military spending, ending aid to South Africa-Contras in Central America-Israel, support of pro-choice laws, support of public transportation.

Burke told a reporter, "We're going to cost Dukakis the election with two million votes he has taken for granted." But as it turned out Dukakis lost the election without the help of the NAP.

Nationally Fulani gained 217,221 votes (0.24%) and placed 4th, a truly impressive and historic finish on many levels-- for openers, Fulani was the first African American woman to be listed on every US ballot. The Fulani/Burke ticket earned 11,888 votes with the percentage result being Alaska 0.51%, North Carolina 0.27%, Washington 0.19%, Arizona 0.14%.

Election history:
1988 - Arizona House of Representatives (New Alliance Party) - defeated

Other occupations: artist, special needs care provider

Notes:
Moved to Tucson, Ariz. in 1983.
As a voter in Washington in 1988 I must confess I do not recall the Fulani/Burke campaign
 registering on my radar. Full disclosure, I was an uncomitted delegate at the Grays Harbor County
 Democratic convention that year. It was final time I ever participated as member of any political
 party and I have regarded myself as an independent ever since.

Mamie L. Moore





Mamie L. Moore, October 17, 1938 -

VP candidate for New Alliance Party (aka Independent) (1988)

Running mate with nominee: Lenora Fulani (b. 1950)
Popular vote: 25,484 (0.03%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

In 1988 Lenora Fulani was the nominee for the New Alliance Party. She managed to achieve the nearly impossible task of gaining ballot status in all 50 states + DC. In some cases the NAP worked with already existing third parties such as the Solidarity Party and United Citizens Party. In California they tried but failed to take over the Peace and Freedom Party and in the process temporarily derailed the PFP for that election year.

Meanwhile, Dennis L. Serrette the NAP Presidential nominee for 1984, denounced the Party as a toxic cult during the 1988 election season. This point of view would be shared by several in the cultbusting community.

Fulani had eight running-mates in 1988, stating "If we got elected, we'd figure it out." Mamie Moore, a community activist from Somerset, NJ was on the ballot with Fulani in nine states. Moore did not appear to have been an active on-the-road campaigner.

In 1987 Fulani said the NAP was prepared to endorse Jesse Jackson in the event he won the Democratic nomination, but in case he didn't her campaign was forging ahead.

The NAP platform included national health care, support for AIDS victims, recognition of Native American treaty rights, stronger environmental regulations, a freeze on military spending, ending aid to South Africa-Contras in Central America-Israel, support of pro-choice laws, support of public transportation.

Nationally Fulani gained 217,221 votes (0.24%) and placed 4th, a truly impressive and historic finish on many levels-- for openers, Fulani was the first African American woman to be listed on every US ballot. The Fulani/Moore ticket had 23,484 popular votes. Their results: Idaho 0.61%, Indiana 0.47%, Hawaii 0.28%, Mississippi and South Dakota 0.23% each, Pennsylvania 0.10%, Kentucky 0.09%, Minnesota 0.08%, Michigan 0.07%.

Election history:
1970 - Somerville Board of Education (Nonpartisan) - defeated 
1990 - US House of Representatives (NY) (New Alliance Party) - defeated

Other occupations: nurse, Director of Somerset Community Action Program, union activist

Notes:
Relocated to Atlanta, Ga.