Showing posts with label election of 1992. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election of 1992. Show all posts

Sunday, October 3, 2021

Jennifer Joan Wilner

 











Jennifer Joan Wilner, November 11, 1970 (Washington, D.C.) -

VP candidate for Independent Democrat (1992)

Running mate with nominee: Russell Minos Baptiste Hirshon (b. 1961)
Popular vote: ? (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Russell Hirshon, a performance artist and bartender in the region of the nation's capital, began his perennial candidacy for DC Mayor and/or US President with instant press coverage. His method of electioneering was to perform flamboyant visual stunts to attract attention. In 1990 he paraded around Washington, D.C. with a flag wrapped around his waist while carrying a chain saw apparently making an environmental statement regarding old growth forests. In another caper he was suspended from a ceiling with live fish and in yet another he was a giant ice cream sundae.

For the 1992 national election he formed the Committee to Put Russell Hirshon in the Big House. His motive? "I want people to vote, to participate. If they don't vote, I might win. Maybe that'll scare them." A poster with Hirshon adorned in a loud suit and standing in a cornfield declared, "Not all presidential candidates are crazy. Just one. Russell Hirshon for President 1992."

In a Jan. 1992 report, Hirshon told the press, "You get looked upon as if you're kind of crazy. Now I'm one of the people I used to laugh at." The candidate managed to put together at least a couple 30-second TV spots that aired on local cable access. The ads included a shot of him sitting on a toilet in public, and he gave out his personal telephone number if voters wanted to ask questions.

Hirshon enjoyed some unplanned publicity in Jan. 1992 when the Bill Clinton campaign held a fund-raising event at the restaurant where he worked. Clinton's people asked that Hirshon not be present at that time. Hirshon responded, "I'm more than capable of being crazy but it's not like I'm a complete psycho."

In 1996 Hirshon filed as an Independent with the FEC under the banner of "Russell Hirshon's Committee of Thugs." He proposed settling the Bosnian wars by holding a huge party with a large open bar. In addition he promised to "blow up the Energizer bunny once and for all." In 2016 he again filed as an Independent using the organization name "Russell Hirshon's Committee to Save America" and used the slogan "Make America Sane Again."

Hirshon's website indicated he was also running for President in 2000 and 2004.

In 2016 his campaign website included this autobiography--

I still believe in a place called hopeful

Russell Hirshon is a Performance Artist/politician who feels the most important aspect of this campaign is making a least one good thing happen from all of the insanity. With two candidates who are as different as possible, we don’t need the kind of money that has been spent to determine who to vote for. Instead we should donate to charitable organizations rather than political campaigns.

As a registered Independent candidate for President, Russell’s mission is to ask as many people as possible to give to a better cause. This means asking ourselves how we can all give to make our world a better place and it starts with us.

A History of Insanity

They say great leaders are born but I beg to differ.  I believe great leaders come from a massive ego coupled with an insatiable demand for attention, acceptance and power. Oh, there is the rare occasion where someone is actually dedicated to hope and change but it is rare and fleeting as the other megalomaniacals manage to arrest any dreamers hope.

Russell Hirshon is the least qualified individual for President.

That being said here are some things to consider:

    Russell does not want your vote
    Russell does not want your money
    Russell Hirshon likes to ride his bike whenever possible and enjoys the wind blowing in his face.
    Russell believes that all Americans should get a Master’s Degree from the School of Hard Knocks.
    Russell is waiting for an interview with Megyn Kelly, preferably at a nice restaurant and where Fox picks up the tab
    Russell likes Pina Coladas.

In all of Hirshon's campaigning throughout the years the only evidence I found thus far of any Vice-Presidential nominee is from a photo published in the Philadelphia Inquirer, Aug. 19, 1992. On the grounds outside the Republican convention in Houston, Hirshon is pictured sitting on a toilet, wearing a patriotic clown suit and reading the National Review. The caption includes: "Running mate Jennifer Wilner is in the background."

Wilner was actually identified as Hirshon's campaign manager in other sources. In the 2016 campaign she was called the campaign's press secretary. A mock investigative 2016 report was posted by Hirshon on Youtube, "Our campaign was rocked by allegations of a possible relationship between the candidate and his press secretary earlier today as an ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) reporter slips in the 'gotcha' question to our press secretary, Jennifer Wilner. Luckily the interview was abruptly stopped and the reporter escorted out of our campaign office. Our statement at this time is the following:  'We are not aware that anything improper has occurred at this time between Russell Hirshon and the press secretary and as far as we know, no text messages exist to indicate the contrary.'"

In 1992 both Hirshon and Wilner were under the Constitutionally mandated age of 35 to hold office.

Election history: none

Other occupations: communications and public relations

Notes:
Hirshon also ran for Mayor of Washington, D.C. in 1990 and 1994. One of his posters read: "If you want to get screwed, elect a politician. If you want to get served, elect a bartender."
It would seem Jennifer Wilner is aka Jen Hirshon.

Wednesday, June 2, 2021

William Thomas Riker

 







William Thomas Riker, September 28, 1987 (Hollywood, Calif.) -

VP candidate for Independent (1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, 2024)

Running mate with nominee (1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, 2024): Jean-Luc Picard (b. 1987)
Popular vote (1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020): ? (0.00%)
Electoral vote (1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020): 0/538

The campaign (1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, 2024):

Star Trek: The Next Generation, a 1987-1994 spinoff from the original Star Trek television series from the 1960s, defined their purpose as, "Space: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise. Its continuing mission: to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no one has gone before."

The Trek franchise is huge and it seems only naturally American for the lead characters to be, in this age where entertainment and politics are so intermingled, merchandised as Presidential timber. Heck, when the show first aired the President at the time was a former movie and TV actor.

The Enterprise skipper, Jean-Luc Picard (portrayed by Patrick Stewart) and his first officer Will Riker (Jonathan Frakes) have been marketed as a Presidential ticket in every election since 1992. They probably ran in 1988 as well but I didn't find a confirmation of that. Bumper stickers, t-shirts, buttons, coffee mugs, etc. abound every four years with a "Picard/Riker" declaration.

"Jean-Luc Picard" filed with the FEC on Aug. 20, 2015 with no party affiliation. His address was given as 877 Enterprise St., Buchanan, MI 49107 and the campaign committee was United Federation of Planets, 150 Galaxy Rd., Shirley, AR 72153.

The Next Generation not only explored space, but the writers broached a number of political and social subjects that were fairly progressive at the time. Intelligence, reason, tolerance, curiosity, and humanity were seen as virtues. The assumption was that not only would we survive ourselves, but a far better, almost utopian age awaited us.

In the event of their electoral victory there would be several problems. They are fictitious characters. They live in the future (Picard was born in the year 2305). Although Riker was born in Alaska, Picard is from France. They reside in outer space. The characters were created in 1987, which made them below the age of 35 but in 2024 they will be legal in this regard. And so forth.

Election history: none

Other occupations: fictional character

Notes:
Riker is a contender for holding the record for number of times someone has made a Vice-Presidential run.

Tuesday, October 6, 2020

Darcy Richardson, 2020 VP Alliance Party

 


Darcy Richardson was selected as the 2020 running-mate for Alliance Party nominee Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente. Richardson has a long history with third parties, both as a candidate and political historian. He is the author of A Nation Divided: The 1968 Presidential Campaign (2002) as well as several works on the history of third parties in US politics. I must say I have consulted his research several times this year in the course of constructing this blog.

Richardson's fascinating career has included working with Eugene McCarthy during the former US Senator's final two runs for the Presidency in 1988 and 1992. Darcy was the National Chair of The New Democrats during that same time period. He has been a consistent champion and activist for challenging the Republican/Democratic duopoly. In 2018 he was the Reform Party's nominee for Governor of Florida.

Darcy's blog, Uncovered Politics, is another go-to place for third party and even mainstream coverage. I've consulted his "Time Capsule" section there several times http://www.uncoveredpolitics.com/

The Alliance Party is still fairly new but has a foundation and network from older political parties that have merged. Check out their webpage at: https://www.theallianceparty.com/

[Note: The interview questions were originally posed on May 6, 2020. That was a lifetime ago but rather than start over I am going to proceed because in a weird way it is more interesting by accident]
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: Darcy, you and I are almost exactly the same age. I have long regarded the assassination of JFK on Nov. 22, 1963 and the resignation of Nixon on Aug. 9, 1974 to be dramatic event bookends of an unusually volatile era. It is also the range of time where we both politically came of age. How did life in 1963-1974 shape your current world view?

I was only seven years old the day JFK was murdered in Dallas, but I vividly remember watching our black-and-white television set that entire dark and dreary weekend.  My parents were distraught.  It all seemed so unreal, but --- as you mentioned --- the period from Kennedy's assassination on Nov. 22, 1963, to Richard M. Nixon's resignation during the Watergate scandal in Aug. 1974 had a profound impact on many in our generation.  The country lost its innocence during that tragic and tumultuous period, which included the unjust and immoral War in Vietnam, and has never really recovered.  Up 'til then, most Americans respected, if not revered, the presidency, regardless of which party occupied the Oval Office.  That's clearly no longer the case today,.

Q: Your association with former Sen. Eugene McCarthy began when you met him during his independent campaign for President in 1976. I count no less than 28 people who were identified as his running-mates that year, almost all considered stand-ins state by state. That just might be a record. He had a very low regard for the second position on a ticket, quoted in the '76 campaign as saying, "Vice-presidential candidates just clutter up the campaign. We should not ask the country to make two judgments. Everyone knows vice presidents have no influence on presidents once elected. Presidents' wives have much more influence. Perhaps we should have candidates' wives debate."  Now that you are a VP nominee yourself, would you care to comment on McCarthy's statement?

Gene was right.  That's one of the reasons I've consciously played such a low-key role in Rocky De La Fuente's campaign.  It's Rocky's campaign.  

Of course, McCarthy was separated from his wife, Abigail, when he made that crack about President's wives having more influence than the Vice President.  I'm not sure who would have had the most influence on Gene himself if he had been elected as an independent in the year of America's Bicentennial since he had also joked during that campaign that he'd probably have a different First Lady every week.  I miss him.

Q: McCarthy shocked the political world when he endorsed Reagan in 1980. When you later worked for Sen. McCarthy in 1988 and 1992, did that 1980 decision prove to be a campaign liability?

The Reagan endorsement came up a few times in 1988 when I was managing Gene's quixotic third-party bid for the White House on the Philadelphia-based Consumer Party ticket, but it was felt most profoundly when McCarthy, mounting an improbable political comeback, sought his old Senate seat from Minnesota six years earlier, in 1982.  Former Vice President Fritz Mondale's folks brought it up time and again during that year's DFL primary --- a race in which Gene was outspent by a nearly 100-1 margin.  They were relentless and unforgiving, still blaming McCarthy for Hubert Humphrey's narrow loss to Richard Nixon some fourteen years earlier.  They never forgave McCarthy, who had risked his own political career by courageously opposing LBJ and the Vietnam War during the 1968 Democratic primaries, for his belated and tepid endorsement of Humphrey, his former friend and Senate colleague, on the eve of that election.  Unlike McCarthy, Humphrey lusted after the presidency and was even willing to sell his soul by supporting Johnson's illegal war in Vietnam in pursuit of the elusive brass ring.

Q: You have been connected with a variety of political parties over the decades: the Democratic Party, Citizens Party, Consumer Party, Boston Tea Party, Reform Party, Peace and Freedom Party, just plain independent, perhaps others and now the Alliance Party. From what I can ascertain it seems like you have been pretty consistent with your progressive views through all this. Why the political party musical chairs?

My support for the above-mentioned parties --- and a few not listed here --- reflect my commitment to the idea of open politics in this country.  While the Consumer Party will always hold a special place in my heart, I haven't really been excited about a new party until now with the emergence of the centrist-oriented Alliance Party.  If we're ever going to end the hyper-partisanship and extreme polarization that's literally destroying this country and its institutions, it will have to come from an entirely new entity such as the Alliance Party.

Q: And speaking of multiple political parties, it appears the Alliance Party is just that, an alliance of numerous third parties. Can you give us the elevator speech on what the Alliance Party is all about?

The Alliance Party is the most promising new party movement to emerge in this country in decades, perhaps in my lifetime.  One and all, they’re a pretty impressive group and they certainly have the country’s best interests at heart.

Led by national chairman Jim Rex, a former college president and the last Democrat to win a statewide office in South Carolina when he was elected State Superintendent of Education in 2006, the Alliance Party is committed to restoring civility in American politics and governance.

The party's Manifesto should be required reading for every American who intends to cast a ballot in this year's presidential election.

Q: You and Alliance Party Presidential candidate Rocky De La Fuente have considerable experience running for public office and you have also been in the role of campaign manager in the past as well. What challenges and opportunities are there that distinguish the 2020 election season compared to past campaigns?

Well, first and foremost, the COVID-19 pandemic changed everything, making in-person campaigning extremely difficult and dangerous and petition drives virtually impossible.  Rocky and I initially hoped to qualify for the ballot in 35-40 states, but ended up qualifying in fewer than half that number.

Given that this election is rightfully a referendum on the reckless megalomaniac in the White House --- if he's still with us on Nov. 3rd, of course --- this is probably going to be a very lean year for America's nationally-organized third parties.  I don't think anyone, not even the anti-government Libertarian candidate, who is on the ballot in all fifty states and the District of Columbia, will come close to cracking one percent of the vote nationally.   

Hell, Steve, to be perfectly honest, I've seriously considered voting for Biden myself...this nation probably won't survive four more years of Trump.  I mean, he's already responsible for 210,000 deaths --- and counting.

As a nation, we deserve better than a self-obsessed narcissist who is willing to callously sacrifice American lives for his own re-election.  That's precisely what's happening.

Q: In terms of ballot access, where are you hoping the Rocky/Darcy ticket will appear in print, as well as being placed as certified write-ins? Looks like the Alliance Party might also have several other candidates for state and local offices?

Rocky and I are on the ballot in Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Vermont.  We also hope to be official write-in candidates in a couple of dozen states.

Rocky is also on the ballot in populous California where --- much to my chagrin --- he's paired with unhinged, pro-Trump rapper Kanye West on the American Independent Party ticket, a remnant of segregationist George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign.

Q: How would you characterize the demographics of the Alliance Party? Who are the members and where are they coming from?

The party is arguably best organized in South Carolina and Minnesota.  I think the Alliance Party membership reflects the changing nation at-large.  We're thrilled , for instance, to have nominated a first-generation Mexican-American candidate for the presidency.  We're a nation divided and most members --- at least those in leadership positions within the party--- are ex-Democrats or former Republicans who grew sick and tired of the dysfunction in Washington and believe that we can do a better, much better, job in bringing this country together.

Let's face it, we're facing twin crises --- a deadly health pandemic and a deepening economic recession that's threatening to become a full-blown depression --- and nothing is being done to alleviate the widespread suffering in our land.  Nothing is being accomplished.  Millions of our fellow citizens have lost their jobs during this pandemic and are on the verge of being evicted from their apartments or losing their homes to foreclosure and neither party is acting with any sense of urgency.

For starters, where is the promised second stimulus?  That's something every voter should ask themselves when casting their ballots between now and Election Day.

Q: What is going on with the Reform Party these days? I see you dropped the idea of pursuing their Presidential nomination.

While I have many friends in the Reform Party and was enormously proud to be the party's standard-bearer in Florida's hotly-contested 2018 gubernatorial campaign, I'm hoping the party, which admittedly has seen better days, will consider formally merging with the Alliance Party following the current campaign.

Q: Two part question--

1. Do you favor any sort of alternative voting methods of selecting people for public office such as approval voting, range voting, ranked choice voting, or sortition?


I'm a strong proponent of Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV), or what used to be called Instant Runoff Voting.  I advocated Instant Runoff Voting while briefly running for Supervisor of Elections in Duval County in a 2005 special election and Rocky and I will be among five choices on the ballot in Maine, which is instituting Ranked Choice Voting in a presidential election for the first time in American history.  It's time has come.

2. Also, would you favor having the office of Vice-President be offered on the ballot as an individual position not tied to a ticket, so we could maybe vote for a President and Vice-President from two different parties?

You mean, I could vote for Joe Biden and myself?  Hmmm.

Q: In the last three years we have seen a spike in activity of Americans denying their own humanity and rejecting the whole concept of civility, tolerance, and respect as they insult, bash, and deflect blame on others in order to elevate themselves. We see this on Twitter, Facebook, and the highest levels of government. How did we get here and how can we turn that around?

Donald Trump.  Plain and simple.  We're so polarized at this point, I'm not sure we can turn it around anytime soon.  Even if he loses, perhaps especially if he loses, Trump will continue to be a divisive and mean-spirited force in this country for the foreseeable future.

Q: Many thanks for taking part in this project. If you'd like to address any issues my questions did not cover, please feel to add your thoughts here--

Thank you, Steve.  It was my pleasure.

In closing, here are the folks I've supported at the ballot box for Vice President during my lifetime: Sally Wheaton (Eugene McCarthy, 1976); Patrick Lucey (John Anderson, 1980); Geraldine Ferraro (Walter Mondale, 1984); Florence Rice (Eugene McCarthy, 1988); James Stockdale (Ross Perot, 1992); Jo Jorgenson (Harry Browne, 1996); Winona LaDuke (Ralph Nader, 2000); Mary Alice Herbert  (Walt Brown, 2004); Thomas Knapp (Charles Jay, 2008); Cindy Sheehan (Roseanne Barr, 2012); Michael Steinberg (Rocky De La Fuente, 2016).

Many of those names, of course, are as obscure as my own.  Thanks again, Steve.

Sunday, April 26, 2020

James Bond Stockdale











James Bond Stockdale, December 23, 1923 (Abingdon, Ill.) – July 5, 2005 (Coronado, Calif.)

VP candidate for Independent (aka No Party Party aka Independents aka Americans for Perot aka Unaffiliated aka Nonpartisan aka Prudence, Action, Results aka Minnesota for Perot aka Independent Initiative Party of Oregon aka Pennsylvanians for Perot aka Perot for President aka Petition aka United We Stand America) (1992)

Running mate with nominee: Henry Ross Perot (1930-2019)
Popular vote: 19,743,821 (18.91%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Early in the 1992 election season I recall seeing future US Sen. Al Franken on the Comedy Network, I think, and he said something like: "As a Democrat, we are used to coming in second. But this year will be different. This year we'll be coming in-- third." He was making a reference to the Presidential run of political independent Ross Perot, a Texas billionaire who was turning the political establishment upside down and was actually leading in the polls early the campaign.

Perot was already known to many Americans as a business tycoon with a flair for publicity with his POW/MIA activities and backing the rescue of Americans imprisoned during the Iranian Revolution. He opposed the first Gulf War and was a critic of the financial condition of the USA after 12 years of Republican administration.

The Perot movement was unique in many respects. Unlike previous major third party efforts, this was not a splinter from one of the major parties led by a professional politician such as Theodore Roosevelt, Robert La Follette, Strom Thurmond, Henry Wallace, George Wallace,  or John Anderson. Nor was it a temporary spike from a longstanding minor party, like Eugene Debs' Socialist campaign in 1912. Using Larry King's television show as his springboard, Perot was a colorful, folksy personality with no elected public service experience who was able to self-fund his campaign to a great degree.

My impression at the time was that most Americans were vaguely aware Perot was sort of a centrist, but it was his personality that really captivated them. His charts, his twangy no-nonsense put-downs of the politico class, and his feisty attitude was refreshing-- at least in the early half of 1992.

Economics was his main priority, where he was a protectionist. On most social issues Perot was to the Left of the Republicans. My Goldwater libertarian contrarian father loved Perot, as did some of my liberal friends, so the attraction was broad. But there again, this might have been a form over content appeal.

His platform included (as near as I can piece together): Pro-choice on abortion ; Balance the budget in six years ; Gay orientation is an individual right ; Criminals have too many rights ; Approach the War on Drugs in military terms ; Supply treatment for drug addicts ;  Raise gas taxes ; Send aid to the former USSR ; NAFTA creates that "giant sucking sound" costing jobs in the US ; Eliminate the Electoral College ; Set up electronic town meetings ; Stricter gun control laws ; Expand Medicare ; Be more aggressive in fighting AIDS.

As the campaign progressed and the media began to vet Perot, some of the less attractive sides of his personality began to emerge. Long considered by the press to be "eccentric," they now added descriptions like "paranoid" and "authoritarian." As the major parties began their conventions, Perot astonished the country by dropping out of the race in July. He even said, if my memory serves, "The Democrats have their act together."

Shortly after Perot's departure from the race (an act that remains mysterious to this day in spite of any reasons given), other third parties were scrambling to scoop up the independent voters who were now looking for a new home. But just as inexplicable as his exit had been, Perot jumped back into the race at the start of October.

Although his credibility had suffered as a result of his odd actions, Perot was considered a major enough force to be included in the Presidential debates, the first and only time both major party candidates were in the ring with an independent. That was a mistake the Republicans and Democrats will probably never make again in my lifetime. Perot clearly took charge of the proceedings, demonstrating that when it came to television, Ross was Boss. Some of the more memorable moments include:

[When George Bush put Perot down for not having professional government experience, Perot responded] Well, I don't have experience in running up a $4 trillion dollar debt. I don't have experience at government gridlock. Or creating the worst school system, the most violent, crime-ridden society in the industrial world. I do have experience in not taking 10 years to solve a 10-minute problem. [I was at my Dad's house when I watched this debate and he loudly cheered when this line was delivered]

Those guys in $1,000 suits and alligator shoes prowling the halls of Congress ... we'll have 'em in the Smithsonian museum.

[On drug dealers] There are people couldn't work the third shift at Dairy Queen driving BMW's and Mercedes.

I'm not here to play Lawrence Welk music.

The American people aren't as stupid as Washington thinks.


If you hate people, don't vote for me.

In the early stages of navigating the Byzantine world of third party ballot access, Perot selected Admiral James Stockdale who was originally intended as a stand-in VP candidate. A true American hero, Stockdale had endured over seven years of imprisonment and torture after having been shot down during the Vietnam War. He had allied himself with some paleoconservative groups after his return to civilian life. In the course of considering a more permanent running mate, Boston University President John Silber's name came up. National Institute of Health Director Bernadine Healy was apparently offered the job, but declined.

By October, Stockdale, aged 68, was tattooed on the ticket, like it or not. His defining moment came during the Vice-Presidential debate with Quayle and Gore, the first and only time a third party VP was allowed in a debate with both major party contenders. Stockdale was given only a week to prepare. For many of us who watched, it was our first real exposure to Perot's running-mate. His much parodied opening line, "Who am I? Why am I here?" was often repeated out of context and used as a source of derision, but in fact when he uttered that phrase at the time it was met with great applause and approval. It looked like a wonderful introduction. Much later at one point he mentioned his hearing aid, and that remark overshadowed most of his other statements.

It was evident the Admiral was not comfortable in the professional political pushy salesman role that was second nature to Quayle and Gore. The moderator had to frequently make an effort to ensure that Stockdale even had an opportunity to speak. Here were my favorite Stockdale highlights from the debate, including "Who am I? Why am I here?" followed by the rest of his introduction:

Moderator: Admiral Stockdale, your opening statement, please, sir.

Stockdale: Who am I? Why am I here? I'm not a politician; everybody knows that. So don't expect me to use the language of the Washington insider. Thirty-seven years in the Navy and only one of them up there in Washington. And now I'm an academic. The centerpiece of my life was the Vietnam War. I was there the day it started; I led the first bombing raid against North Vietnam. I was there the day it ended, and I was there for everything in between. Ten years in Vietnam. Aerial combat and torture. I know things about the Vietnam War better than anybody in the world. I know some things about the Vietnam War better than anybody in the world. And I know how governments -- how American governments -- can be courageous and how they can be callow, and that's important. That's one thing I'm an insider on.

I was the leader of the underground of the American pilots who were shot down and imprisoned in North Vietnam. You should know that the American character displayed in those dungeons by those fine men was the thing of beauty. I look back on those years as the beginning of wisdom, learning everything a man can learn about the vulnerabilities and the strengths that are ours as Americans. Why am I here tonight? I am here because I have in my brain and in my heart what it takes to lead America through tough times.


------------------------------------------------------------

[Quayle and Gore dominated the airtime. After a long session of back and forth bickering, Stockdale finally commented with perfect timing] And I think America is seeing right now the reason this nation is in gridlock. The trickle-downs and the tax-and-spends, or whatever you want to call them, are at swords' points; you can't get this economy going. Over here we've got Dan, whose President is going to take eight years to balance the budget, and on my left, the Senator, whose boss is going to get it halfway balanced in four years. Ross Perot has got a plan to balance the budget five years in length from start to finish. And we're people of the non-professional category who are just sick of this terrible thing that happened to the country, and we've got a man who knows how to fix it. And I'm working for him.

------------------------------------------------------------

Moderator: Admiral Stockdale, would you like to start the discussion period?

Stockdale: Well, I'm out of ammunition on this.

------------------------------------------------------------


Stockdale: I believe that a woman owns her body and what she does with it is her own business -- period. Period.

Moderator: That's it?

Stockdale: I don't -- I, too, abhor abortions but I don't think they should be made illegal and I don't think it's a political issue. I think it's a privacy issue.

------------------------------------------------------------

Although I had no intention of voting for Perot I recall having a favorable opinion of Stockdale immediately after the debate, but my opinion was definitely in the minority. In terms of integrity, honesty, and serving the public good over party loyalty, I felt Stockdale won the debate.

Saturday Night Live had a field day with Stockdale in a famous skit that had Perot (Dana Carvey) attempting to abandon an addled Stockdale (Phil Hartman) in the woods like an unwanted pet and it cemented the image of the Admiral as a drag on the ticket. I'm a fan of Carvey and Hartman (RIP), but it was former SNL actor Dennis Miller who a couple years later more accurately summed up the debate:

Now I know (Stockdale's name has) become a buzzword in this culture for doddering old man, but let's look at the record, folks. The guy was the first guy in and the last guy out of Vietnam, a war that many Americans, including our present President, did not want to dirty their hands with. The reason he had to turn his hearing aid on at that debate is because those f-----g animals knocked his eardrums out when he wouldn't spill his guts. He teaches philosophy at Stanford University, he's a brilliant, sensitive, courageous man. And yet he committed the one unpardonable sin in our culture: he was bad on television.

Unfortunately in later years Miller endorsed Donald "Bone Spur But I Don't Remember What Foot" Trump in 2016 who infamously said of former POW John McCain, "He's not a war hero. He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren't captured." You would think that loathsome quote would be a deal breaker for any patriotic American no matter what their political leaning. But obviously Miller and other conservatives suffered from a condition known as situational ethics (it afflicts liberals as well). Even so, I still agree with Miller's critique of how unfairly Stockdale was treated by the media.

The Perot/Stockdale ticket made history on Election Day. Just by raw numbers they racked up nearly 20 million popular votes, the most of any stand alone third party in the US. Their percentage vote of 18.91% ranked as the third highest ever for a minor party after the Progressive (1912) and American (1856) parties. Perot's failure to acquire any Electoral votes demonstrated that his support was evenly spread geographically although his highest percentages were mostly in the Far West. The debate on whether Perot was a spoiler, handing the election to Bill Clinton continues to be an open question to this day. In my corner of the world, out here in the coastal and rural logging country of Washington State, Perot pushed George Bush into third place in my county and town.

Perot was the victor in several counties across the country. In Utah and Maine he placed second. Only in DC and Mississippi did he finish with under 10% of the popular vote. He would be back in 1996.

Admiral Stockdale's legacy is contributing a philosophical outlook to popular culture called "The Stockdale Paradox." When asked by writer Jim Collins how he survived over seven years of brutality and torture in the "Hanoi Hilton," Stockdale said: "You must never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end — which you can never afford to lose — with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be."

When asked who failed to make it out of the POW condition he said, "Oh, that's easy, the optimists. Oh, they were the ones who said, 'We're going to be out by Christmas.' And Christmas would come, and Christmas would go. Then they'd say, 'We're going to be out by Easter.' And Easter would come, and Easter would go. And then Thanksgiving, and then it would be Christmas again. And they died of a broken heart."

His real-life brand of stoicism is being revisited and quoted today by writers covering the way Americans are having to adjust to a new New in this age of Covid-19.

Election history: none.

Other occupations: Officer USN, President of the Naval War College, President of The Citadel, author, lecturer, fellow with the Hoover Institution, board of directors Rockford Institute,

Buried: United States Naval Academy Cemetery (Annapolis, Md.)

Notes:
Endorsed Pete Wilson in the 1996 Republican primaries.
Buried in the same cemetery as Pedro del Valle, John McCain, Stansfield Turner, and Elmo Zumwalt
 Jr.
Full disclosure: I voted for Clinton in 1992 but enjoyed Perot's ability to poke the system. If I do say
 so, I was known to perform a dead-on impersonation of Mr. Perot and would call up my friends and
 colleagues pretending to be the candidate asking for their votes. You might think that's just sad but
 I'm tellin' you it was a really world class act.

Saturday, April 25, 2020

Nancy Theresa Lord














Nancy Theresa Lord, February 8, 1952 (Silver Spring, Md.) -

VP candidate for Libertarian Party (aka Independent) (1992)

Running mate with nominee: Andre Verne Marrou (b. 1938)
Popular vote: 290,087 (0.28%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

In a contested convention, 1988 Libertarian VP Andre Morrou emerged as the 1992 Presidential nominee.

The nomination for running-mate was even more contested. Morrou's personal choice was passed up and after multiple ballots the Party selected Nancy Lord over more established figures. Raised in the Jewish faith (just like 1972 VP Tonie Nathan), Lord was impressively a lawyer with a medical degree. 1980 Libertarian Presidential candidate Ed Clark had backed Lord for the VP position. In 1992 she was a member of the National Rifle Association and the National Abortion Rights Action League-- that might seem like a strange combination for most members of the major parties, but perfectly in the groove for Libertarians.

By 1992 the Libertarian Party had been around for over two decades and even by then had emerged as America's most stable third party. They were not going to go away. In this election year they were a bit handicapped financially without a millionaire or household name on the ticket, nor did they seem to have any campaign investment angels. On top of that, Ross Perot was grabbing most of the voters who were discontented with the major parties, and 1988 Libertarian Presidential nominee Ron Paul endorsed Pat Buchanan in the 1992 Republican primaries.

Hopefully this won't insult my Libertarian friends, but the Marrou/Lord ticket superficially appeared to me to have a similar dynamic as the Clinton/Gore team. Marrou being the outgoing charmer with a sense of humor. But also the one to go on the attack. Lord being the more reserved policy wonk. In the course of shaking hands while on the street she was known to pay more attention to dogs the people were walking than the potential voters. That indicator would be foreshadowing her unfortunate dog legal experience a couple decades later.

Lord told reporter Hal Marcovitz the Libertarians will win the White House by 2000, or 2004 at most. "We want to be the governing party by the 21st century," said Lord. "If we're not, I would be concerned."

Reporters noted Lord's candid, honest comments and found her very quotable. Some examples:

Sometimes I get very tired of hearing myself talk. Campaigning is very tiring. Not being in control of where you sleep, or what you eat. It wears you out.

[After her car was broken into and robbed in Manhattan]: If Bill Clinton's car had gotten broken into it would have been on the national news. But my car gets broken into and it's just another larceny.

Every bad thing does not need a law against it. You don't make something illegal just because it's stupid.

We want the government out of our personal lives and out of our economic lives. When you centralize power, you attract people who like to wield it. They produce very benevolent reasons, but they are after power.


Marrou had apparently made some enemies within the Party and he was nearly removed from the ticket. There were serious charges against him involving unpaid child support, a contempt of court outstanding warrant, more multiple marriages than he originally claimed, spending campaign money without approval, and mismanagement of  personal finances. But rather than give him his day in Party court, they decided to allow him to remain on the ticket for fear of generating bad publicity.

The national ticket disappointing results dipping down to 0.28% would serve as one of their lower point elections, but their percentages have all been better than that ever since. But in the local results the Party enjoyed some actual wins, plus higher percentages. One idea was that Perot voters continued to vote for third parties as they went down-ballot and the Libertarians were the ones to get the most benefit.

On the Presidential ballot in all 50 states + DC for only the second time, the Libertarians had their best showings in: New Hampshire (0.66%), Colorado (0.55%), Alaska (0.53%), Arizona (0.46%), Pennsylvania ; California (0.43% each), and Wyoming (0.42%).

Election history:
1990 - Mayor of Washington, DC (Libertarian Party)- defeated
2010 - Nye County (Nev.) District Attorney (Republican) - primary - defeated
2012 - Nye County (Nev.) District Attorney (Republican) - primary - defeated
2012 - District Court Judge, District 5, Department 1 (Nev.) - defeated

Other occupations: attorney, board of directors for the National Association for the Reform of Marijuana Law (NORML), Abbott Laboratories employee, board of directors for the Fully Informed Jury Association

Notes:
Demonstrated against the Vietnam War before joining the Libertarians.
Also called Nancy Lord Johnson for awhile after marrying former militia figure James "J.J." Johnson
 ca1997.
Was embroiled in Nye County, Nev. court cases ca2012 regarding charges resulting from hoarding
 about 40 dogs.

Friday, April 24, 2020

Cyril William Minett






Cyril William Minett, January 23, 1930 (Haywood County, NC) - September 29, 2006 (Texas?)

VP candidate for Populist Party (aka America First Party aka Independent aka Constitution Party) (1992)

Running mate with nominee: James Gordon "Bo" Gritz (b. 1939)
Popular vote: 107,014 (0.10%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Prior to running for President the flamboyant and always controversial James "Bo" Gritz (rhymes with "rights") was a soldier during the Vietnam War, followed by POW/MIA activist efforts, followed by embracing a long list of conspiracy theories. His life story could be a novel, except some would ask would it be like Elmer Gantry or instead like Heart of Darkness? At first he had alliances across the political spectrum especially after he exposed Reagan administration figures involved with drug trafficking and also after he later opposed the 1991 Gulf War, but as the Left learned more about his connections with the extreme Right, Christian nationalists, Holocaust deniers and his personal homophobic, anti-Semitic views, they backed away.

In 1988 Gritz had been the Populist Party VP nominee but dropped out. As he later told the story:

I was invited by the Populist Party in 1988 to share my POW experiences. I accepted the paid invitation to speak. Following my talk, I was told they planned to run James Traficant [D-Ohio] as their presidential candidate. I knew and respected Traficant. They asked me to be his running mate. After lunching with Traficant, I consented. My name was instantly accepted by the delegates. It wasn't until the next day that they rejected Traficant in favor of David Duke, whom I did not know.

I immediately informed the leadership of my withdrawal, but was urged to first meet with Duke. Photos were taken and we spoke briefly. I found Duke to be a brash, untraveled, overly opinionated, bigoted young man and resigned as a non-member candidate. Duke was furnished with another running mate who appeared on the voting ballot with him.


He began his 1992 run by attempting to gain multiple nominations. He ran in the Independent Voters primary in Massachusetts and his name was entered for nomination with the American Independent Party, the American Party in South Carolina, and the US Taxpayers Party. In each case the winner was Howard Phillips. In Minnesota Gritz was identified as the nominee of the Constitution Party, so perhaps he did manage to affiliate with another party in that state but information regarding that ballot line is difficult to find. Gritz was officially given the Populist Party nomination in May 1992. He said he was approached by the Party leaders much earlier and he accepted on the condition that he was the sole author of the platform.

The Populist Party platform included: eliminating the Federal Reserve, eliminating the IRS, balancing the federal budget, revoke the 17th amendment and have members of the US Senate elected once again by state legislatures rather than popular vote, end foreign aid, oppose the "The New World Order," workfare instead of welfare, stop illegal immigration, restore states' rights, stop all farm foreclosures, rescue the remaining POWs, cut the pay of all elected and appointed officials, diminish the power of the judicial branch, and recognize that America is a Christian nation. The campaign slogan was "God, Guns, Guts and Gritz."

Gritz's running-mate was Cyril "Cy" Minett, who served as a USAF fighter pilot in Vietnam and had been retired since 1974.

Minett predicted dire consequences if the Populists failed to win. "This is our last chance. If we don't get it done in 1992, very likely what's going to happen is that George Bush is going to declare a national emergency. They're going to suspend the Constitution, and then the fat is in the fire."

The running-mate believed, as did many in the Populist Party, that there was a conspiracy by the combined forces of the Trilateral Commission, Council of Foreign Relations, the media, and major corporations who were really operating the levers of power against the interests of the average working person.

According to one report, Minett "also believes there are 10 regional governments organized, with an appointed leader chosen and answerable only to the president, that are ready and waiting for their place in international power." If I am connecting the dots correctly, each "appointed leader" would possibly be an alien somehow associated with Hatonn. Now it gets interesting--

The writer Adam Parfrey, in an Apr. 8, 1993 piece for the San Diego Reader, related this story regarding Gritz and Minette:

On various weeks of the 1992 campaign, the Weekly World News supermarket tabloid showed candidates Clinton, Perot, and Bush shaking hands with a space alien. Bo Gritz may have been the only candidate to actually attempt to enact such an event. Apparently, his vice presidential candidate, Cyril Minett, had convinced Gritz in the midst of his campaign to fly to the Tehachapi Mountains north of Los Angeles to meet with Hatonn, the eight-and-a-half-foot reptile-like Commander from the Pleiades.

Recalls Gritz, "We got to this little storefront, and Cy says, 'Now, I just want to verify this. Hatonn himself is going to walk in and meet with us?' And a person said, 'Yes, he'll be here momentarily.' I had this vision in my mind of a person in a lizard suit walking across a parking lot, but momentarily [a woman who] calls herself Dharma sat down at the table and said very quickly without any fanfare, 'I am present.' And I thought, 'Shoot, we got a channeling thing going on here.' Cy said, 'Are you eight and a half feet?' She said, 'No, no, I'm actually nine and a half feet.' " 


So there you have it.

Gritz himself subscribed to numerous conspiracy theories, just to name a few: JFK's death was a coup involving very complicated connections -- Jonestown was a government project gone wrong -- FEMA has concentration camps -- The AIDS virus was invented in government labs -- The barcode is somehow connected with Satan -- We will all eventually have microchips embedded in our right hands -- Armageddon will come in 1996.

In August 1992 Gritz made national headlines when he successfully negotiated a peaceful settlement in the Ruby Ridge incident. A hero to some, Gritz became unpopular with others. He told Parfrey, "The Aryan Nation people were mad. They wanted Randall Weaver dead. They would have had their martyr. The media was mad. They wanted the Weavers up there in that little clapboard cabin as nothing but charred bones. That would have made a wonderful story. The truth is, a number of Weaver's neighbors were mad because they hated Weaver for whatever reason. A lot of people were mad because Weaver came out of there alive. And it just happened to be my misfortune that ... I got the Weaver family out alive with no more bloodshed."

Although Gritz was a natural in terms of gaining publicity, even some of his admirers were shocked at how naive he was politically. His expressing an open admiration for the criminal and unstable James Traficant serving as an example or choosing to address a small rally rather than appear on TV with Larry King where millions would hear his message. Being an outsider of the politico class does have a certain attraction for some voters, but demonstrating an inability to learn the game presents huge obstacles. Still, in spite of this handicap, the Populist Party Presidential ticket did surprisingly well even with Ross Perot sucking all the oxygen out the room for several other third parties.

The Gritz/Minett team placed 5th nationally with the most support coming from Mormon strongholds and the Far West. On the ballot in 18 states they finished 4th in seven of them: Utah (3.84%), Idaho (2.13%), Louisiana (1.04%), Montana (0.89%), Nevada (0.57%), Arizona (0.55%), Alaska (0.53%). They also were certified write-ins in about 17 other states, doing particularly well in that format in Wyoming (0.28%) and Oregon (0.10%)-- high percentages for write-ins.

Election history: none

Other occupations: US Air Force (1954-1974), editor of Aerospace Safety Magazine, flight instructor, emu rancher and exotic sheep raiser, author 

Buried: Ridgeview West Memorial Park (Frisco, Tex.)

Notes:
Trivial Washington State trivia. When Kevin Harris was airlifted out of Ruby Ridge, he was taken to
 Sacred Heart Hospital in Spokane, where I was born. Well, actually I was born in the old previous
 building.
Minett attempted to be granted a Sovereign Citizen type of status in a Texas court in 1994.

Wednesday, April 22, 2020

Alexander Benzion Magnus Jr.



Alexander Benzion Magnus Jr., March 8, 1926 (Chicago, Ill.) - August 21, 2002 (Cook County, Ill.)

VP candidate for US Taxpayers Party (1992)

Running mate with nominee: Howard Jay Phillips (1941-2013)
Popular vote: 0? (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

If the old saying that religious converts turn into the most zealous believers is true, Howard Phillips might serve as a case study. Raised in the Jewish faith, he converted and became an evangelical Protestant as an adult in the 1970s and founded the US Taxpayers Party, known today as the Constitution Party.

Phillips had been a loyal Republican Party foot soldier and eventually worked in the Nixon administration as the director of two agencies but resigned due to what he perceived as the liberal drift of his party. It was during the era when the Watergate scandal was unraveling, so Phillips' timing was excellent for the purposes of finding an alternative. He briefly identified himself as a Democrat and ran for the US Senate as such.

As he felt no satisfaction with either major party, Phillips founded the Conservative Caucus in 1974. By the 1980s-early 1990s even the Reagan and Bush administrations were too liberal as well as fiscally irresponsible for him. He supported the Libertarian Party in the 1988 election but felt they were much too permissive in their social policies. In the meantime he had been busy networking with other conservative activists and in 1991 served as a co-founder of the US Taxpayers Party. Unlike the major parties, the US Taxpayers Party was more of a confederation than a union.

Phillips was the USTP Presidential nominee in 1992, his first of three runs. His running mate was Albion W. Knight, Jr., a retired US Army Brigadier General who resigned from his position as an Archbishop of the United Episcopal Church of North America in order to run. Phillips had two other VPs, Stephen C. Graves in Louisiana and Robert Tisch in Michigan.

The USTP made an attempt, and failed, to gain ballot access in Illinois. When that didn't work they still did not obtain a certified write-in status there. Alexander B. Magnus, who ran a property management company in Arlington Heights, was the designated running-mate. He was even on file with the FEC.

The US Taxpayers Party made it to the ballot under variations of that name in 14 states. In addition some older political parties climbed on board and endorsed the USTP. The Independent American Party of Nevada (no relation to the national Independent American Party) had Phillips/Knight on their ballot line. Parts of two rival parties that hated each other, the American Party (Rhode Island and South Carolina) and American Independent Party (California), also joined up. In Massachusetts Phillips won the Independent Voters primary. In cases where he competed for votes, Phillips' main competitor was Bo Gritz.

One party the USTP failed to absorb was the Right to Life Party in New York. Instead of Phillips the RTLP endorsed president Bush for re-election.

The USTP platform included: Cut federal spending by $500 billion a year -- Abolish the IRS -- Support capital punishment -- Appoint only judges who oppose abortion -- oppose Planned Parenthood -- Repeal quotas -- Support the Electoral College -- Promote Biblical philosophy in government -- oppose gun control -- Sever US ties with the UN, World Bank, and IMF -- End foreign aid -- Oppose Gay rights -- No women in combat -- Eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts -- Eliminate pensions for elected officials -- Eliminate the Public Broadcasting Service.

Magnus seemed a bit perplexed at the attention he received from a reporter as the VP, and mentioned that he thought Phillips was "a little extreme." It should be mentioned that Magnus helped fund the publication of several Right-wing conspiracy theory monographs regarding the Pan Am Lockerbie terrorist bombing, Vince Foster's alleged murder and the Clintons, the Oklahoma City bombing, the pre-9/11 World Trade Center bombing, and "Truther" beliefs concerning 9/11. He also used his wealth to help fund conservative challengers to moderate Republicans in Illinois elections.

On the ballot in 21 states and write-ins in six others, the USTP finished with 43,400 votes (0.04%) on Election Day, somewhat under the 50,000 predicted by some pundits. 33,585 of those votes were for the Phillips/Knight ticket. They probably would have placed with a higher percentage but it is reasonable to conclude that a good number of their targeted base voted for Ross Perot or Bo Gritz. In Illinois there were 17 write-in votes and perhaps one or more of those were for the Phillips/Magnus ticket.

Election history:
1997 - Arlington Heights (Ill.) School Board - defeated

Other occupations: US Army soldier, engineer, property management company, activist with Taxpayers United and the Illinois Taxpayer Education Foundation, with his wife Maria created the Magnus Charitable Trust in 1995, involved with Americans for Responsible Media, operator of Manteks- a corporate management firm

Buried: Memory Gardens Cemetery (Arlington Heights, Ill.)

Notes:
Voted for John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan.
Held several patents on fuel pumps and supply systems.