Showing posts with label Reform Party of the United States of America. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reform Party of the United States of America. Show all posts

Thursday, November 12, 2020

Kenneth Robert Cross

 







Kenneth Robert Cross, December 14, 1948 (Flint, Mich.) - December 20, 2018 (Batesville, Ark.)

VP candidate for Reform Party of the United States of America (aka Independent) (2012)

Running mate with nominee: Andre Nigel Barnett (b. 1976)
Popular vote: 966 (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

The Reform Party held their convention in Aug. 2012. Andre Barnett of New York won the nomination. Others who had expressed an interest at some point in the previous year included Darcy Richardson, Laurence Kotlikoff, and Buddy Roemer. By the time of the convention most potential candidates had dropped out but one of them, Ken Cross of Arkansas, settled for the Vice-Presidential bid.

Cross had filed with the FEC for President in 2008 and again in Aug. 2011, both times under the New Populist Party, an entity he created in 2004. His 2008 and 2012 campaign webpage outlined a centrist/conservative platform--

My stand on a number of important social and political issues is as follows:

    Believe that an exit strategy should be developed regarding the Iraq war. Conducting an endless war is not consistent with American tradition or beliefs.
    Believe in strong adherence to the Constitution.
    Believe in balancing the budget.
    Prefer détente, deterrence and containment in preference to pre-emptive strike strategy except when attack is imminent beyond reasonable doubt.
    Support evaluating the effectiveness of the “no child left behind” program and modifying or replacing it as appropriate. A suitable replacement would be a “Quality Education Initiative” which would concern itself with the development of all students and not just the ones that are behind.
    Do not support privatization or any other approach that would significantly weaken Social Security.
    Promote increasing energy self-sufficiency with emphasis on renewable energy alternatives.
    Prefer fair trade agreements over free trade agreements.
    Support protecting the environment.
    Opposed to abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or when the life of the mother is at risk.
    Opposed to gay marriages but support civil unions with certain legal rights.
    Support affirmative action but oppose quotas.


Barnett was also a conservative but without the centrist moderation of Cross. The On The Issues website summarized Barnett's political views--

Opposes abortion as a woman's right. (Jan 2012)
Opposes requiring companies to hire more women & minorities. (Jan 2012)
Opposes same-sex domestic partnership benefits. (Jan 2012)
Supports the death penalty. (Jan 2012)
Opposes mandatory Three Strikes sentencing laws. (Jan 2012)
Drug use is immoral: enforce laws against it. (Jan 2012)
Supports teacher-led prayer in public schools. (Jan 2012)
Opposes school vouchers. (Jan 2012)
Alternatives as well as coal & oil. (Jan 2012)
Supports expanding free trade. (Jan 2012)
Stricter limits on political campaign funds. (Jan 2012)
Supports absolute right to gun ownership. (Jan 2012)
Opposes more federal funding for health coverage. (Jan 2012)
Expand the armed forces. (Jan 2012)
The Patriot Act harms civil liberties. (Jan 2012)
Opposes illegal immigrants earning citizenship. (Jan 2012)

The Reform Party of Kansas, which had disaffiliated from the national party, grabbed the Reform Party ballot line in that state and nominated Chuck Baldwin and Joseph L. Martin. The State sided with the local party so Barnett/Cross were forced to run as write-ins there. The Mississippi Reform Party nominated perennial candidate Barbara Dale Washer with Cathy L. Toole as the VP.

Barnett/Cross were on the ballot in Florida where they finished 10th out of 12 with 0.01% of the vote in that state. They were also write-ins in Alaska, Idaho, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Texas, Utah, and Washington.

Election history:
2008 - US President (New Populist Party) - defeated
2012 - Reform Party of the United States of America nomination for US President - defeated
2016 - Reform Party of the United States of America nomination for US President - defeated
2020 - Green Party of the United States nomination for US President - died in 2018

Other occupations: civil engineer, management consultant, foundry worker, construction worker, furniture company owner

Buried: Oaklawn Cemetery (Batesville, Ark.)

Notes:
Baptist

Sunday, November 8, 2020

Joseph L. Martin

 


Joseph L. Martin, December 6, 1968 -

VP candidate for Reform Party of Kansas (2012)

Running mate with nominee: Charles Obadiah Baldwin (b. 1952)
Popular vote: 5,017 (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

The Kansas branch of the Reform Party of the United States of America appeared to have disaffiliated from the national party at some point between the 2004-2008 elections. In 2008 they crossed parties and endorsed Constitution Party nominees Chuck Baldwin/Darrell Castle. In June 2012 they once again nominated Baldwin but this time with Joseph Martin as his VP.

It would seem Baldwin had nothing to do with the Kansas Reform Party nomination. Since the 2008 election he relocated from Florida to Montana, where he became an even more outspoken anti-Zionist and embraced the survivalist American Redoubt concept--

God has led us to the conviction that Montana (along with other Mountain states) is going to be the tip of the spear in the freedom fight; and we believe God wants us to be part of that fight. We plan to start a new ministry where I can preach and my family can sing and minister (you should hear them sing!). Once we get established and can raise the funds, I definitely plan to livestream my messages on the Internet as we have been doing at Crossroad for the past year and a half. And if God opens the door, I will not rule out a run for State office. Yes, the freedom message is both spiritual and political; and I am afraid of neither!

For years, people have been asking me, “Chuck, what can we do?” Well, this is what God has led my family and me to do. We are convinced that the only way freedom has a chance to survive in these States united is to recapture the spirit of liberty–one State at a time. (To continue to focus on Washington, D.C., is a waste of time and energy!) And God has led us to the conclusion that Montana (and nearby states) is the place where freedom-minded patriots have a fighting chance to prevail. Instead of telling you what to do, my family and I are showing you what we believe we should do.


Baldwin had rejoined the Republican Party in order run for the position of Lt. Governor in Montana, but aborted that campaign prior to the 2012 primary.

His running-mate Joseph Martin was in Statesville, NC during the 2012 election but he had been a longtime activist with the Kansas Reform Party since 2000 when he joined as part of the Pat Buchanan wave. A Christian conservative, he was not happy when the national party backed Ralph Nader in 2004. Martin had run for Lt. Governor and Secretary of State under the Reform Party banner in Kansas. He was allied with Ron Paul supporters and said he was part of the effort to "put Chuck Baldwin on our Reform Party of KS ballot line in 2008." It appears he moved to North Carolina around 2010.

When Martin ran for Kansas Secretary of State in 2006 he provided an answer to those who used the abortion issue as a political litmus test--

Yes, I am Pro-life. All of our candidates are pro-life, some without exceptions, some with reservations like "life of the mother" and rape.

I am completely pro-life. Abortion should not be a legal medical procedure. If invasive surgery is required to save the mother, then that procedure should be to save her life and not to kill the child.

I am also completely against the use of embryonic stem-cell research. It is unethical, inhumane, and a contemptuous assault on human dignity. In addition, the research so far has been largely a complete failure: God and His Nature are trying to show mankind that this is unacceptable and useless.

I support reasonable research on adult stem-cells, which has been showing promise.

I am also against the forced harvesting and sale of organs from political dissidents against their will. This is a booming business in China, while our country's leaders do nothing about it, and our media are almost completely mute on this crime against humanity being done by our "Most Favored" trading partner.

Kansas has an entity called the Kansas Objections Board which is comprised of the Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General. In Sept. 2012 they heard two pleas. First was from the Reform Party of the United States of America. The national party had nominated Andre Barnett for President and wanted the ballot line occupied by Baldwin. Secondly, it was reported the Reform Party of Kansas wanted to rescind the Baldwin nomination and replace his name with that of Constitution Party nominee Virgil Goode and was planning to make their appeal to the Objections Board. The Board rejected the the former request, and appears to have said no to the latter as well if they did make the request.

Meanwhile, Martin was living in North Carolina and had become involved with the newly created Christian Party, which provided this self-description on their webpage--

About the Christian Party

For government truly to provide freedom to the people in our country, both the concepts in the Bible and the Constitution are necessary. Therefore, it is our goal in the Christian Party of North Carolina to empower Christians politically to glorify the Lord, by influencing government through the political process so that it conforms to both Biblical principles and the Constitution.

The Christian Party of North Carolina came into existence in response to the need for there to be a political voice for Christians in our state. On 9/3/10 the Christian Party of North Carolina was officially registered with the North Carolina State Board of Elections.

We are affiliated with the Constitution Party of America, a new national political party which is also Christian and 100% Pro-life. We welcome you as a fellow Christian to join us in restoring true Biblical leadership in government. To that end we ask that you please check out our “Get Involved” page.


For his part, Baldwin mostly stayed clear of the Kansas situation. However he did weigh in on his webpage that he believed Romney was going to win--

Posted on Nov 1, 2012
A Word About The Elections

With the 2012 Presidential election just a few days away, it is almost superfluous for me to engage in any kind of in depth discussion, as most people cannot, for the life of them, get past the political theater that is currently crescendoing to a climax. Therefore, I will simply provide readers with a few passing thoughts regarding the elections next week.

I think Mitt Romney will somewhat comfortably win the Presidential election. This will cause “conservatives,” Christians, and most Republicans to go into a state of deep hibernation, which will allow Romney to wreak havoc upon the Constitution and liberties of the people. In 2012, Barack Obama is the “Boogeyman” that must defeated at all costs. But the fact is, with the exception of Romney’s more business-friendly approach to economics, the differences between Obama and Romney are negligible.

The Baldwin/Martin team took 0.43% of the Kansas vote.

Election history:
2006 - Kansas Secretary of State (Reform Party of the United States) - defeated
2008 - US Senate (Kan.) (Reform Party of the United States) - defeated

Other occupations: computer programmer.

Notes:
Martin has a BS in Mathematics from Georgia Institute of Technology, 1992.
Baldwin joined the Independent American Party after the 2012 election.

Wednesday, October 14, 2020

Frank Edward McEnulty

 



Frank Edward McEnulty, 1956 (Long Beach, Calif.) -

VP candidate for Reform Party of the United States of America (2008)

Running mate with nominee: Theodore C. Weill (1925-2009)
Popular vote: 481 (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Ted C. Weill, who was 83 years old at the time of the 2008 campaign season, was the nominee of the Reform Party for that election cycle. A figure in the Party in Mississippi since at least the 1990s, he had attempted to gain the Presidential nomination in 2004 but stepped aside for Ralph Nader.

Weill had a history of supporting third party candidates. In addition to Nader he contributed significant sums of money to Lyndon LaRouche and Lenora Fulani's organizations, which raised some concerns from Reform Party members. Weill's response was. "I'd like to see what they do with the money."

Weill's stand on the issues included: a balanced budget mandate, term limits, elimination of the Electoral College, make PACs illegal, and no federal tax increase without a popular vote.

The July 2008 Reform Party convention, which was disputed as the "real" convention status by one faction, nominated Frank McEnulty as Weill's running-mate. McEnulty was not a member of the Reform Party.

Frank McEnulty, a California estate agent filed with the FEC for President in Feb. 2007 as an independent but that did not prevent him from entering the Republican primaries, at least in Arizona. On Mar. 11, 2008 he gained the nomination of the newborn New American Independent Party. Shortly after his nomination, he was in Alaska seeking the endorsement of the Alaska Independence Party alongside members of the American Independence Party and was identified by Alaskan media as a member of the AIP. It does get confusing, doesn't it? He was also a contender for the Reform Party nomination but lost out to Ted Weill, so he became the running-mate.

It was erroneously reported on some outlets that McEnulty announced he was going to drop his own Presidential campaign in order to campaign full time as the Reform Party VP. McEnulty was definitely running under both banners. It is not unheard of for a candidate to be running for President on one ticket and be the VP on another in the same election. William Jenner in 1956 is one example that springs to mind, and Dick Gregory in 1968 although McEnulty's case was more deliberate.

McEnulty's statement on the matter:

At the Reform Party Convention, held recently in Dallas, TX, I was selected to be their Vice Presidential Candidate to run on the ticket with Ted Weill, the Presidential candidate. I am honored to accept this nomination and see this as an important step in uniting the various third party groups around the country into a stronger, more effective voice.

To that end, I am continuing my independent run for president in the other states in which the Reform Party does not have ballot access. I firmly believe the answer for a better America is in a strong, viable third party that will address the views and needs of the Moderate Majority Americans being ignored by the Democrats and Republicans.

I want to reiterate that I am still the New American Independent Party Presidential candidate for the 2008 election and have discussed this strategy at length with Michael Thompson the Chairman of the NAIP. We are continuing our ballot access efforts and hope that this latest development will help our message to be heard in more states. Thank you for your continued support.

The NAIP was formed in 2004 with an eye to the middle class as a political base. Although the Party attempted to hold the center, it generally came off appearing to be sort of a Libertarian-lite, preaching the gospel of a small federal government, more local control, fiscal conservatism, personal responsibility, less government intrusion into personal lives, and an end to political party tribalism. McEnulty himself was a great admirer of Reagan and a NRA supporter.

In Feb. 2008 McEnulty told an interviewer about his parameters for a VP selection--

I will be looking for someone who is smart, wants what is best for all Americans, is a moderate, a fiscal conservative and will put forth the time and effort to run in a real campaign. I also believe that my running mate needs to be a business person because the government is a business and needs to run more like one. I’m not worried about being outsiders in the Washington scene, because I believe that gridlock is good for the following reason. If there is gridlock, then only legislation that makes sense for all Americans and benefits the vast majority of all Americans will get passed. We’ve got hundreds of thousands of laws. We don’t need new ones every day.

For reasons that are not clear, McEnulty had 9 different running-mates. He made the ballot only in Colorado, and attempted to be a registered write-in in the remainder.

Due to a civil war within the Reform Party, by the time the dust settled to any degree it was really too late for the Weill/McEnulty team to effectively campaign. The split in the party was so severe that the Kansas chapter endorsed Constitution Party nominee Chuck Baldwin, who appeared on the ballot there under the Reform banner. The Ohio chapter endorsed Ron Paul.

Ballot Access News, which was then and remains today one of the most excellent go-to online places for third party news, had a lively comment thread regarding the Reform Party on July 20, 2008. McEnulty himself weighed in. The most interesting exchange to me involved Michael Thompson, the National Chair of the New American Independent Party--

Michael Thompson on July 22, 2008 at 3:47 pm said:

I would like to respond to the many emails that I have been getting from New American Independent Party members and other interested folk.

People have been wondering if the New American Independent Party will now be working with the Reform Party since our nominated Presidential candidate has accepted the VP slot with the Reform Party.

The simple answer to that is NO. The New American Independent Party has no interest and will have no interest in working with any faction of the Reform Party. The NAIP views the Reform Party and it’s many twisted factions as a tumor, infecting everything it touches. The NAIP will not allow the nutcases at the Reform party to infect our new party.

I am sure that the Reform party has some very good and decent rank and file members. However, we feel that we cannot trust any of the Reform Party leadership from any and all factions.

I will have more information to bring all of you in the coming days concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

Michael Thompson
National Chairman
New American Independent Party

TheTrueReformist on July 22, 2008 at 4:07 pm said:

Michael:
My question to you is: Then why is your Presidential Nominee, seeking the VP slot in Ted Weill's campaign and why did he come to the Reform Party seeking our nomination at all? Personally, your views are too liberal for those of us who do have good organized SPO’s. We are not and will not be seeking affiliation with the NAIP and neither Frank or Ted will get our ballot access in Florida. Over my dead body!!!!!

 Michael Thompson on July 22, 2008 at 8:06 pm said:

True Reformist,

You should ask Frank McEnulty that question not me. The NAIP is still trying to figure out what happened.

Such a move does not help the NAIP, it only hurts us. The NAIP is a new party and we didn’t expect to get on many ballots this year. But, the ballots that we thought we had the best chance of reaching were Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi. Basically, Frank took away his chance at leading a ticket in those states for a VP role in a party that is dying. And this move also took away the NAIP’s best chance at getting on state ballots.

The NAIP hoped to get on some ballots this year in an effort to build our party towards a more powerful 2012 campaign. We have no choice but to try to gain ballot access and run our own ticket, (a NAIP ticket) in Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi.


The Weill/McEnulty ticket were on the ballot in Mississippi only, where they placed 7th out of 7. Weill died on Nov. 20, 2009, meaning McEnulty would have assumed the Presidency if they had been elected.

Election history:
2008 - Republican nomination for US President - defeated
2008 - Reform Party of the United States of America nomination for US President - defeated
2008 - US President (New American Independent Party) - defeated

Other occupations: financial officer, property management, teacher

Notes:
Catholic.

Tuesday, October 6, 2020

Darcy Richardson, 2020 VP Alliance Party

 


Darcy Richardson was selected as the 2020 running-mate for Alliance Party nominee Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente. Richardson has a long history with third parties, both as a candidate and political historian. He is the author of A Nation Divided: The 1968 Presidential Campaign (2002) as well as several works on the history of third parties in US politics. I must say I have consulted his research several times this year in the course of constructing this blog.

Richardson's fascinating career has included working with Eugene McCarthy during the former US Senator's final two runs for the Presidency in 1988 and 1992. Darcy was the National Chair of The New Democrats during that same time period. He has been a consistent champion and activist for challenging the Republican/Democratic duopoly. In 2018 he was the Reform Party's nominee for Governor of Florida.

Darcy's blog, Uncovered Politics, is another go-to place for third party and even mainstream coverage. I've consulted his "Time Capsule" section there several times http://www.uncoveredpolitics.com/

The Alliance Party is still fairly new but has a foundation and network from older political parties that have merged. Check out their webpage at: https://www.theallianceparty.com/

[Note: The interview questions were originally posed on May 6, 2020. That was a lifetime ago but rather than start over I am going to proceed because in a weird way it is more interesting by accident]
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: Darcy, you and I are almost exactly the same age. I have long regarded the assassination of JFK on Nov. 22, 1963 and the resignation of Nixon on Aug. 9, 1974 to be dramatic event bookends of an unusually volatile era. It is also the range of time where we both politically came of age. How did life in 1963-1974 shape your current world view?

I was only seven years old the day JFK was murdered in Dallas, but I vividly remember watching our black-and-white television set that entire dark and dreary weekend.  My parents were distraught.  It all seemed so unreal, but --- as you mentioned --- the period from Kennedy's assassination on Nov. 22, 1963, to Richard M. Nixon's resignation during the Watergate scandal in Aug. 1974 had a profound impact on many in our generation.  The country lost its innocence during that tragic and tumultuous period, which included the unjust and immoral War in Vietnam, and has never really recovered.  Up 'til then, most Americans respected, if not revered, the presidency, regardless of which party occupied the Oval Office.  That's clearly no longer the case today,.

Q: Your association with former Sen. Eugene McCarthy began when you met him during his independent campaign for President in 1976. I count no less than 28 people who were identified as his running-mates that year, almost all considered stand-ins state by state. That just might be a record. He had a very low regard for the second position on a ticket, quoted in the '76 campaign as saying, "Vice-presidential candidates just clutter up the campaign. We should not ask the country to make two judgments. Everyone knows vice presidents have no influence on presidents once elected. Presidents' wives have much more influence. Perhaps we should have candidates' wives debate."  Now that you are a VP nominee yourself, would you care to comment on McCarthy's statement?

Gene was right.  That's one of the reasons I've consciously played such a low-key role in Rocky De La Fuente's campaign.  It's Rocky's campaign.  

Of course, McCarthy was separated from his wife, Abigail, when he made that crack about President's wives having more influence than the Vice President.  I'm not sure who would have had the most influence on Gene himself if he had been elected as an independent in the year of America's Bicentennial since he had also joked during that campaign that he'd probably have a different First Lady every week.  I miss him.

Q: McCarthy shocked the political world when he endorsed Reagan in 1980. When you later worked for Sen. McCarthy in 1988 and 1992, did that 1980 decision prove to be a campaign liability?

The Reagan endorsement came up a few times in 1988 when I was managing Gene's quixotic third-party bid for the White House on the Philadelphia-based Consumer Party ticket, but it was felt most profoundly when McCarthy, mounting an improbable political comeback, sought his old Senate seat from Minnesota six years earlier, in 1982.  Former Vice President Fritz Mondale's folks brought it up time and again during that year's DFL primary --- a race in which Gene was outspent by a nearly 100-1 margin.  They were relentless and unforgiving, still blaming McCarthy for Hubert Humphrey's narrow loss to Richard Nixon some fourteen years earlier.  They never forgave McCarthy, who had risked his own political career by courageously opposing LBJ and the Vietnam War during the 1968 Democratic primaries, for his belated and tepid endorsement of Humphrey, his former friend and Senate colleague, on the eve of that election.  Unlike McCarthy, Humphrey lusted after the presidency and was even willing to sell his soul by supporting Johnson's illegal war in Vietnam in pursuit of the elusive brass ring.

Q: You have been connected with a variety of political parties over the decades: the Democratic Party, Citizens Party, Consumer Party, Boston Tea Party, Reform Party, Peace and Freedom Party, just plain independent, perhaps others and now the Alliance Party. From what I can ascertain it seems like you have been pretty consistent with your progressive views through all this. Why the political party musical chairs?

My support for the above-mentioned parties --- and a few not listed here --- reflect my commitment to the idea of open politics in this country.  While the Consumer Party will always hold a special place in my heart, I haven't really been excited about a new party until now with the emergence of the centrist-oriented Alliance Party.  If we're ever going to end the hyper-partisanship and extreme polarization that's literally destroying this country and its institutions, it will have to come from an entirely new entity such as the Alliance Party.

Q: And speaking of multiple political parties, it appears the Alliance Party is just that, an alliance of numerous third parties. Can you give us the elevator speech on what the Alliance Party is all about?

The Alliance Party is the most promising new party movement to emerge in this country in decades, perhaps in my lifetime.  One and all, they’re a pretty impressive group and they certainly have the country’s best interests at heart.

Led by national chairman Jim Rex, a former college president and the last Democrat to win a statewide office in South Carolina when he was elected State Superintendent of Education in 2006, the Alliance Party is committed to restoring civility in American politics and governance.

The party's Manifesto should be required reading for every American who intends to cast a ballot in this year's presidential election.

Q: You and Alliance Party Presidential candidate Rocky De La Fuente have considerable experience running for public office and you have also been in the role of campaign manager in the past as well. What challenges and opportunities are there that distinguish the 2020 election season compared to past campaigns?

Well, first and foremost, the COVID-19 pandemic changed everything, making in-person campaigning extremely difficult and dangerous and petition drives virtually impossible.  Rocky and I initially hoped to qualify for the ballot in 35-40 states, but ended up qualifying in fewer than half that number.

Given that this election is rightfully a referendum on the reckless megalomaniac in the White House --- if he's still with us on Nov. 3rd, of course --- this is probably going to be a very lean year for America's nationally-organized third parties.  I don't think anyone, not even the anti-government Libertarian candidate, who is on the ballot in all fifty states and the District of Columbia, will come close to cracking one percent of the vote nationally.   

Hell, Steve, to be perfectly honest, I've seriously considered voting for Biden myself...this nation probably won't survive four more years of Trump.  I mean, he's already responsible for 210,000 deaths --- and counting.

As a nation, we deserve better than a self-obsessed narcissist who is willing to callously sacrifice American lives for his own re-election.  That's precisely what's happening.

Q: In terms of ballot access, where are you hoping the Rocky/Darcy ticket will appear in print, as well as being placed as certified write-ins? Looks like the Alliance Party might also have several other candidates for state and local offices?

Rocky and I are on the ballot in Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Vermont.  We also hope to be official write-in candidates in a couple of dozen states.

Rocky is also on the ballot in populous California where --- much to my chagrin --- he's paired with unhinged, pro-Trump rapper Kanye West on the American Independent Party ticket, a remnant of segregationist George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign.

Q: How would you characterize the demographics of the Alliance Party? Who are the members and where are they coming from?

The party is arguably best organized in South Carolina and Minnesota.  I think the Alliance Party membership reflects the changing nation at-large.  We're thrilled , for instance, to have nominated a first-generation Mexican-American candidate for the presidency.  We're a nation divided and most members --- at least those in leadership positions within the party--- are ex-Democrats or former Republicans who grew sick and tired of the dysfunction in Washington and believe that we can do a better, much better, job in bringing this country together.

Let's face it, we're facing twin crises --- a deadly health pandemic and a deepening economic recession that's threatening to become a full-blown depression --- and nothing is being done to alleviate the widespread suffering in our land.  Nothing is being accomplished.  Millions of our fellow citizens have lost their jobs during this pandemic and are on the verge of being evicted from their apartments or losing their homes to foreclosure and neither party is acting with any sense of urgency.

For starters, where is the promised second stimulus?  That's something every voter should ask themselves when casting their ballots between now and Election Day.

Q: What is going on with the Reform Party these days? I see you dropped the idea of pursuing their Presidential nomination.

While I have many friends in the Reform Party and was enormously proud to be the party's standard-bearer in Florida's hotly-contested 2018 gubernatorial campaign, I'm hoping the party, which admittedly has seen better days, will consider formally merging with the Alliance Party following the current campaign.

Q: Two part question--

1. Do you favor any sort of alternative voting methods of selecting people for public office such as approval voting, range voting, ranked choice voting, or sortition?


I'm a strong proponent of Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV), or what used to be called Instant Runoff Voting.  I advocated Instant Runoff Voting while briefly running for Supervisor of Elections in Duval County in a 2005 special election and Rocky and I will be among five choices on the ballot in Maine, which is instituting Ranked Choice Voting in a presidential election for the first time in American history.  It's time has come.

2. Also, would you favor having the office of Vice-President be offered on the ballot as an individual position not tied to a ticket, so we could maybe vote for a President and Vice-President from two different parties?

You mean, I could vote for Joe Biden and myself?  Hmmm.

Q: In the last three years we have seen a spike in activity of Americans denying their own humanity and rejecting the whole concept of civility, tolerance, and respect as they insult, bash, and deflect blame on others in order to elevate themselves. We see this on Twitter, Facebook, and the highest levels of government. How did we get here and how can we turn that around?

Donald Trump.  Plain and simple.  We're so polarized at this point, I'm not sure we can turn it around anytime soon.  Even if he loses, perhaps especially if he loses, Trump will continue to be a divisive and mean-spirited force in this country for the foreseeable future.

Q: Many thanks for taking part in this project. If you'd like to address any issues my questions did not cover, please feel to add your thoughts here--

Thank you, Steve.  It was my pleasure.

In closing, here are the folks I've supported at the ballot box for Vice President during my lifetime: Sally Wheaton (Eugene McCarthy, 1976); Patrick Lucey (John Anderson, 1980); Geraldine Ferraro (Walter Mondale, 1984); Florence Rice (Eugene McCarthy, 1988); James Stockdale (Ross Perot, 1992); Jo Jorgenson (Harry Browne, 1996); Winona LaDuke (Ralph Nader, 2000); Mary Alice Herbert  (Walt Brown, 2004); Thomas Knapp (Charles Jay, 2008); Cindy Sheehan (Roseanne Barr, 2012); Michael Steinberg (Rocky De La Fuente, 2016).

Many of those names, of course, are as obscure as my own.  Thanks again, Steve.

Friday, September 11, 2020

Jon Adam Greenspon

 

Jon Greenspon



Jon Adam Greenspon, October 17, 1964 (Los Angeles, Calif.) -

VP candidate for Independent (2008)

Running mate with nominee: Bill Ingram (b. ca1957)
Popular vote: ? (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Bill Ingram, a trucker from Elk Mound, Wis., made his Presidential declaration to the FEC in July 2007 as an Independent. His semi was festooned with campaign ads and slogans, which along with his website was Ingram's primary form of electioneering. In case lightning didn't strike for the White House pursuit, he was also running as a write-in candidate for US Congress at the same time.

Meanwhile, in a story that apparently started in Barstow, Calif. but shifted to Manhattan, Mont., Jon Greenspon of California filed with the FEC as a Presidential candidate for the Reform Party on May 24, 2007. He refiled as an Independent about three months later.

2008 must have been the big year for independent tickets to merge since it seemed to have taken place quite frequently. Greenspon, now in Montana, became Ingram's running-mate on June 24, 2008. The VP assured the press the team were not extremists, "We're more what the experts would consider Reagan centrists. We're so America can have a voice in its own government." The fact that by 2008 Reagan would be equated with centrists sort of illustrates how far to the Right the Republican Party had journeyed since the 1980s.

A sample from the Ingram/Greenspon website--

Bill Ingram
and
Jon Greenspon
Independent Candidates for an Independent America

First, We'd like to do something completely un-politician in style. We're going to tell you up front what not going to be done during this campaign. We're not going to promise to cut taxes, or anything that CANNOT be accomplished by the President himself. We'll be happy to work with Congress, but ultimately some of this is their show.

Campaign promises should be made that can actually have a chance of being kept.

During the first 178 hours, not days or weeks, We intend to:

    Go to Iraq and Afghanistan.
    Stop unchecked earmark spending in the United States Congress
    Put the Southern US Border Fence on a fast track to protect American citizens, and
    Give America back to the people.

The people don't have the time, inclination or need for our 44th Presidential administration to worry about inauguration parties, appeasing the corporate structures that helped them get into the Oval Office, or giving in to the backroom deals made to attain this venerable post. We need action and results. In these United States, there can only be one special interest group to answer to - "We The People."

We plan to serve you, not political action groups. Together we can return America to a country that Abraham Lincoln claimed "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it." It is that time to exercise our rights.

Join us as we give America back to Americans.

William "Bill" Ingram and Jon Greenspon

Although their platform could be best described as Right of center, Ingram's view on abortion was that of a true independent--

Abortion is one of the most controversial and evenly divided issues in this country.  I know this will come up so here is my view.

I honestly could care less one way or the other on this issue.  I do not agree with abortion, but I do not believe that I have the right to make that decision for someone else.

Here is how I will deal with the abortion issue.  If I am presented with a "clean" bill on abortion, meaning a bill that has no earmarks or pork added to it.  This bill has to be about abortion and only abortion.  It can not be clouded with money for our troops, educations, bridge repair, etc.  It must be a clean bill.  If the Senate and Congress can agree on a bill on abortion to which they will personally take responsibility, I will sign it, no matter which way it goes.


In late October, only a week or so before Election Day, Ingram announced he was suspending his Presidential campaign in order to run as a write-in candidate for the Wisconsin State Assembly.

After the election Greenspon prepared for his 2012 Presidential run in the Republican primaries. In a Youtube presented in 2009 he was part of presenting an interesting concept, as explained in the introductory text:

Jon Greenspon running for President of the United States will do his part to make BRING HOME THE POLITICIANS a reality.

What is it?  

It's relocating US Representatives and Senators to our State Capitals and State Representatives and Senators to our City Halls/Courthouses in our districts to securely telecommute for no less than 75% of their terms while we surround them.


Election history:
2008 - US President (Independent) - withdrew
2012 - Republican nomination for US President - withdrew
2012 - Mayor of Bozeman, Mont. (Nonpartisan) - defeated

Other occupations: US Marine Corps, truck driver, communications engineer

Notes:
Quit the 2012 Presidential race in order to run for Mayor of Bozeman, Mont.

Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Peter Miguel Camejo Guanche





 Moore and Maher beg Nader not to run in 2004







Peter Miguel Camejo Guanche, December 31, 1939 (New York, NY) – September 13, 2008 (Folsom, Calif.)

VP candidate for Independent (aka Populist Party aka Reform Party of the United States of America aka Better Life aka Peace and Justice Party aka Unaffiliated aka Independent Party of Delaware) (2004)

Running mate with nominee: Ralph Nader (b. 1934)
Popular vote: 235,856 (0.19%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Expressing a desire to not become beholden to the platform of any party, Ralph Nader announced he was running for President in 2004 as an independent. Yet he also sought the endorsement (rather than the nomination) of several already established third parties as a way to more easily acquire ballot access. The Reform Party, Independent Party of Delaware, and Independence Party did just that, making him their de facto nominee. Some parties were simply invented as a 2004 one-shot deal due to local requirements. For example, Nader ran in Alaska, Arkansas, and Maryland under the Populist Party name, apparently unconcerned of the legacy of white nationalist policies connected with the recent party of that name 1984-1996 and still a fresh memory.

Although Nader never joined the Green Party, it was under their banner that he was perceived, perhaps unfairly, as being the spoiler in the 2000 election and handing the White House to George W. Bush especially in Florida. The Green Party had some significant differences of opinion within their ranks on how to proceed in 2004. Generally speaking there were three factions at play here.

The first group desired to endorse Ralph Nader's independent run. Nader himself had announced in Dec. 2003 he would not seek the Green nomination, but later he realized the Party's endorsement would come in handy in terms of ballot access although he had no intention of joining the Greens himself. The pro-Nader faction was energized when a week before the Green convention Nader had selected GP activist Peter Camejo as his running-mate. Camejo in fact had won the most popular votes in the Green Party primaries for President.

The second group wanted to run a campaign with a "pure" Green candidate (David Cobb was the frontrunner) rather than ride on the star power of a political celebrity who was not necessarily in line with the Party platform. Cobb, a California attorney and Party activist, had worked hard to gain the nomination as he electioneered across the country gathering delegates.

The third group promoted the idea of sitting out the 2004 Presidential contest and instead concentrate on elections at the grassroots local level. A leaflet from this faction at the convention included, "Choosing No Candidate will allow Greens to build strength at the grassroots, avoiding a punishing national media fight we cannot win ... Our best route to national influence is building local power."

On June 26, 2004 Cobb won the nomination on the second ballot. He named Pat LaMarche, a Green Party activist in Maine, as his running-mate.

Unlike Nader/Camejo the Cobb/LeMarche ticket adopted a "safe state" strategy of not campaigning hard in swing states where they thought they could possibly tip the scales in favor of Bush. Cobb rationalized, "In California, Cobb-LaMarche's message is going to be, 'Progressives, don't waste your vote.' Because if a progressive casts a vote for the corporate militarist John Kerry in California, it does not help to unelect Bush, and you can only send a message that you actually support policies that you don't. That's a wasted vote. Simple message: progressives, don't waste your vote. In the other states where it's very much closer, we have the same, in-depth, scathing critique of both the Democratic and Republican parties, and then conclude with, 'but think carefully before you cast your vote.' You know, that is completely respecting the voter, and it is really challenging those voters to think about why we have a system where I have to vote against what I hate, rather than support what I want."

LaMarche suggested she just might pull the level for the Democrat on Election Day, "If the race is tight, I'll vote for Kerry."

A swath of the Left felt the Greens were capitulating to the Democrats far too much. The Vermont Green Party broke ranks and endorsed Nader/Camejo. Other Greens appeared to migrate to the Socialists in 2004, giving them a larger popular vote than usual.

Peter Camejo spent most of his early years in Venezuela, although he was born in New York.

Camejo had a long history as a worker for social justice issues. He had participated in one of the Selma civil rights marches in 1965. Two years later he was expelled from UC Berkeley for his demonstration activities. Gov. Ronald Reagan called him one of the ten most dangerous people in California because he was "present at all anti-war demonstrations." Camejo was also an activist for migrant farm workers' rights.

During this era Camejo's political vehicle was the Socialist Workers Party. He was their Presidential nominee in 1976. As the SWP became more rigid and some say cult-like as they assigned Party workers places to live and work and infiltrate, Camejo either quit or was expelled in 1980. "I tried to make changes inside the SWP, and it was very difficult. I guess it's like being in the Catholic Church and suggesting that Mary wasn't really a virgin or something," he later said.

He gravitated to the Green Party, supported Nader for President in 1996 and 2000, and by 2004 had already run twice as a Green for the office of California Governor, including in that wild 2003 recall election with 135 candidates.

In the four years since Nader last ran 9/11 had happened and the Bush administration was wrapping up their first term. Although President Bush called himself a uniter, not a divider, his economic policy, military initiatives, and interpretation of civil liberties under the Constitution seemed to widening the polarization of the country. Many in the Progressive side were willing to overlook Sen. Kerry's centrism and spent not a small amount of energy attempting to get Nader out of the race or off the ballots.

In one the most famous incidents in the 2004 campaign Bill Maher and Michael Moore got down on their knees and begged Nader on the Real Time television program on July 31, 2004 to drop out of the race.

There were others who agreed--

Keeping the Bush circle out means holding one's nose and voting for some Democrat. ... In a very powerful state, small differences may translate into very substantial effects on the victims, at home and abroad. It is no favor to those who are suffering, and may face much worse ahead, to overlook these facts.
–Noam Chomsky

I am going to run around this country and do everything I can to dissuade people from voting for Ralph Nader. ... this election will come down to a relatively few votes. ... I consider four more years of Bush a potential horror show for this country.
–Bernie Sanders

If Kerry is elected, we'll have a little ledge to stand on.
–Howard Zinn

Last time around, Nader attracted the support of a stellar list of left-leaning celebrities; Phil Donahue, Susan Sarandon, Michael Moore, Paul Newman, Bonnie Raitt, Willie Nelson, Eddie Vedder, and Ani DiFranco were all Naderites. That won't be the case this year.
-Mother Jones Magazine

A number of anti-Nader websites from the Progressive community sprang up: The Nader Factor, United Progressives for Victory, Vote2StopBush.org,  Dear Ralph, StopNader.com, Ralph Don't Run, Repentant Nader Voter PAC, Nader Watch Blog, Don't Vote Ralph, Ralph-Nader.info, Damned Big Difference, and Greens for Kerry (Change In '04).

"It's an ego-fueled Trojan Horse for the right wing," said Bob Gammage of StopNader.org, "The Republicans perceive (the Nader campaign) the same way we do: A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush. They're hoping ... they can confuse enough people to take the election away from Kerry."

Nader met with the Congressional Black Caucus in June. It did not go well. The CBC had asked Nader to drop out of the election and by the end there were raised voices, Nader was told by one member of Congress to "get your ass out" of the meeting, and Rep. Melvin Watt said the candidate was "just another arrogant white man, telling us what we can do. It's all about your ego, another [expletive] arrogant white man." Nader later demanded an apology for the language used in the meeting but never got it.

Some of the other attendees had choice words as well:
"He ain't playing with a full deck"--Rep. James Clyburn
"I don’t think he gets it ... The meeting was about strategy and the pragmatic planning to defeat Bush ... We told him how at strategic level, his candidacy defeats a common a goal ... We were particularly offended by Nader's exhibitionism, his selfishness and egotism"--Rep. Albert Wynn
"If he didn't understand what the meeting was about, not only is he an egotistical maniac, he's dumber than I thought he was"--Rep. Gregory Meeks

There was evidence the Republicans and far-Right groups were doing what they could to help Nader along, which was an unsurprising and old political practice by political parties helping the enemy of their enemy dating back to the early 1800s in US politics.

But as it was Nader's 2004 showing was faint compared to 2000. Rather than setting the foundation for a new progressive party, he was starting to be perceived by many as a perennial candidate for a personality-driven movement.

Nader was on the ballot in 35 states + DC and a registered write-in in 12 states finishing third nationally with 465,642 votes (0.38%). Of those, the Nader/Camejo ticket was on the ballot in 32 states + DC and certified write-ins in half a dozen more. In New York, Nader was on two different ballot lines, each with a different running-mate (with Camejo in the Peace and Justice Party, with Jan D. Pierce in the Independence Party). Pierce was also on the ballot with Nader in Alabama. Karen Sanchirico was the running-mate in Montana. Nader had no VP at all in 6 write-in slots.

Nader/Camejo cracked 1% in Alaska 1.62%, Vermont 1.44%, Utah 1.22%, North Dakota 1.20%, Wyoming 1.13%, South Dakota 1.11%, Maine 1.09%, and Rhode Island 1.06%.

After the election my friend and shirttail relative Robert C. "Bob" Bailey, who had once been one of the most powerful Democrats in Washington State, said he was not surprised at the re-election of George W. Bush. "Voters don't like to change Presidents in wartime, no matter how bad they are," was his view.

Shortly before his death in 2008, Camejo endorsed the Nader/Gonzalez ticket.

Election history:
1965 - New York City Council President (Socialist Workers Party) - defeated
1967 - Mayor of Berkeley, Calif. (Nonpartisan) - defeated
1976 - US President (Socialist Workers Party) - defeated
2002 - Governor of California (Green Party of the United States) - defeated
2003 - Governor of California (Green Party of the United States) - defeated
2004 - Green Party of the United States nomination for US President - defeated
2004 - Green Party of the United States nomination for US Vice-President - defeated
2006 - Governor of California (Green Party of the United States) - defeated

Other occupations: author, activist, stockbroker, Chief Executive Officer of Progressive Asset Management

Buried: ?

Notes:
One of his opponents in the 1967 election was Jerry Rubin.
Winner of the 2002 election was Gray Davis.
Winner of the 2003 election was Arnold Schwarzenegger. Camejo placed 4th in a field of 135
 candidates. I watched this amazing election from up north in Washington and was rooting for
 Georgina "Georgy" Russell.
The 2006 election included Arnold Schwarzenegger (winner), Art Olivier, Janice Jordan, and James
 Harris.
An accomplished yachtsman competing in the 1960 Olympics on behalf of Venezuela.
Full disclosure. I voted for Nader in 2000. Kerry in 2004.

Monday, August 17, 2020

Jennifer A. Ryan




Jennifer A. Ryan

VP candidate for Christian Freedom Party (2004)

Running mate with nominee: Thomas James Harens (b. 1954)
Popular vote: 2,387 (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Thomas J. Harens had been a former legislator in the Minnesota House of Representatives (1981-1982) as a member of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party. Stating he did not feel welcome in that organization due to his anti-abortion views, he joined the Reform/Minnesota Independence Party under which banner he ran for Mayor of Saint Paul in 1997. In 2004 when he formed the Christian Freedom Party, he said he also considered himself a member of the Minnesota Independence Party as well.

Raised as a Catholic, Harens called himself a progressive Christian and had a platform with a liberal economic agenda. In many ways he anticipated the present American Solidarity Party. "There are millions of progressive Christians who don't feel represented," he told the press. "In this new testament chapter the Democrats are the amoral rabble, by the Christian Right Wing and their allies of republicanism are the new Pharisees, the ones Jesus chased out of the temple," he also said.

The candidate, frequently adorned with a beret that had a paramilitary style to it, did enjoy some statewide press coverage and managed a webpage that had no mention of his running-mate Jennifer A. Ryan who was also apparently a resident of Minnesota. If indeed she was a Minnesotan then the duo would have faced a Constitutional problem in the event of their victory.

Republicans wondered if Harens was a stalking horse for the Kerry campaign, designed to hurt the Republican vote. Harens denied any contact with the Democrats.

Only on the ballot in Minnesota the Harens/Ryan ticket won 0.08% of the popular vote in that state.

Election history: ?

Other occupations: ?

Notes:
Another mystery VP

Monday, July 20, 2020

William James Higgins Sr.



William James Higgins Sr., July 6, 1932 (Boston, Mass.) - January 29, 2017 (Bow, N.H.?)

VP candidate for Reform Party of the United States of America (2000)

Running mate with nominee: Patrick Joseph Buchanan (b. 1938)
Popular vote: 11,149 (0.01%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

"Truly to speak, and with no addition,
We go to gain a little patch of ground
That hath in it no profit but the name.
To pay five ducats, five, I would not farm it."
--a military captain in Hamlet, attempting to explain the cause of a battle

The Reform Party had become low-hanging fruit for carpetbaggers in 2000. Thanks to Ross Perot's appeal and the hard work of his activists, the Party was at the turn of the century an organized network with (and here the starting gun for the political equivalent of the Oklahoma Land Rush  is fired) over $12 million in matching funds.

There were two potential candidates who had an honest claim to the nomination. Ross Perot himself declined to run. Jesse Ventura, who had made history when he was elected Governor of Minnesota as a member of the Reform Party in 1998, would also have been a legitimate contender if he had  wanted.

John Anderson, the former Republican who had run as an Independent for President in 1980 and Ron Paul the Republican who was also briefly a Libertarian when he ran for President under that banner in 1988, were also names that were bandied about as potential Reform Party nominees. Another name that had come up was Lowell Weicker, an ex-Republican who had served as Governor of Connecticut as a member of the independent Connecticut Party.

But when announcements were made there only three big names that were put forward: Donald Trump, John Hagelin, and Pat Buchanan.

Trump had been encouraged to run by Ventura. A Democrat until 1987, he had toyed with the idea of running for President as a Republican in 1988.  In 1999 Trump campaigned for the Reform Party nomination on a conservative platform but did endorse universal public health care and was more liberal on some social issues than he would be later in his political career. He said he wanted Oprah Winfrey as his running-mate. Roger Stone was his campaign director. By Feb. 2000 Ventura left the Reform Party and Trump withdrew from the race. Trump re-registered as a Democrat in 2001 and then as a Republican in 2009.

John Hagelin was running for President as the Natural Law Party nominee for the third election in a row. He was attempting to merge with the Reform Party and came close enough that his delegates from the latter party held their own convention. Unfortunately for Hagelin, the courts sided with Buchanan but that didn't stop the NLP candidate from sometimes showing up on ballots under the Reform Party label. In some states both Buchanan and Hagelin were on the ballot under the Reform Party name.

In 1992 and 1996 Ross Perot tended to avoid taking strong stands on cultural or social issues that created deep divisions among Americans. His main focus was economic. Pat Buchanan, on the other hand, had established himself as a Right wing "cultural warrior" when he ran for the Republican nomination for President in 1992 and 1996. When he began his campaign for President as a member of the Reform Party, he changed the entire premise for the existence of the organization, making it more of an affluent version of the Constitution Party in 2000. Rather than attempting to unite people with issues they had in common, Buchanan hammered away on divisive hot button social problems such as opposing abortion, Gay rights, Affirmative Action. He held views some called racist on non-white immigration. Using the slogan "America First" (which had previously been employed by fascist sympathizer, anti-Semite, white supremacist, and Holocaust denier Gerald L.K. Smith in his Presidential campaign), Buchanan offered no original ideas that were not already in the platforms of other Right wing political parties concerning foreign relations or the economy.

In spite of this he was able to elicit the support of former New Alliance Party Presidential candidate Lenora Fulani (later withdrawn) as well as future Socialist nominee Brian Moore. Klansman David Duke also hopped on board the Buchanan campaign, as well as members of the neo-Nazi National Alliance, bringing a contingent of White Nationalist support.

In New York he ran under the banner of the Right to Life Party and in Colorado under the American Party.

After considering James P. Hoffa and others, Buchanan selected Ezola Foster, one of his co-chairs from the 1996 campaign. The California-based Foster had made a name for herself as an extremely conservative African American activist. Foster was known for her views against immigration, abortion, and Gay rights. She defended the display of the Confederate flag. She said God brought slaves from Africa to America so "their descendants would know freedom." Her placement on the ticket confused several of Buchanan's more racist followers.

Foster became a controversial pick. Her membership with the John Birch Society was more than simply carrying the card, she was also part of their lecture circuit talent pool. She described the civil rights movement as a "revenge and reparations movement" and didn't think segregation was really all that bad even though she grew up in Louisiana as part of the oppressed community. Rev. Jesse Jackson and his ilk were "Leninist race-baiters" according to Foster.

Foster said "government schools," i.e. public education, were "socialist training camps." She opposed AIDS education in schools because she felt it promoted homosexuality. Foster was outspoken and hardline about illegal immigrant children. As a high school teacher she said she was persecuted for her conservative beliefs and was forced to accept worker's compensation 1996-1998 until she retired because of stress. She later said the "mental disorder" claim was faked but reporters uncovered she had suffered from depression since the 1970s and had recently been prescribed antidepressants.

The Buchanan/Foster team alienated many of the veteran Reform Party members including Perot himself. The 2000 ticket generally placed 4th around the country, behind Ralph Nader and the Greens. In Oklahoma and South Dakota they placed third but in both cases Nader was not on the ballot. There were 45 states with Foster as the VP. In Massachusetts for some reason the running-mate was William J. Higgins Sr., in Oregon no VP was apparently listed, and in Michigan Buchanan was a write-in.

Higgins was a former Democrat who became an active Republican later in life.

The Buchanan/Higgins ticket finished 5th out of 6 on the Massachusetts ballot with 0.41% of the popular vote in that state.

Election history:
2010 - Massachusetts State Senate (Republican) - defeated

Other occupations: US Air Force (Korean War), credit manager, postal worker, postmaster, Northborough (Mass.) Town Treasurer, Northborough (Mass.) Town Clerk, Northborough (Mass.) School Committee Chairman

Buried: Howard Street Cemetery (Northborough, Mass.)

Notes:
Disabled veteran
Was sued by the winner of the 2010 State Senate race for making false accusations during the
 campaign. Higgins later apologized.

Sunday, July 19, 2020

Ezola Broussard Foster











Below: Florida's "Butterfly Ballot"

Ezola Broussard Foster, August 9, 1938 (Maurice, La.) – May 22, 2018 (Boulder City, Nev.)

VP candidate for Reform Party of the United States of America (aka Independent aka American Party aka Citizens First aka Independence Party aka Right to Life Party aka Freedom Party) (2000)

Running mate with nominee: Patrick Joseph Buchanan (b. 1938)
Popular vote: 438,032 (0.42%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

"Truly to speak, and with no addition,
We go to gain a little patch of ground
That hath in it no profit but the name.
To pay five ducats, five, I would not farm it."
--a military captain in Hamlet, attempting to explain the cause of a battle

The Reform Party had become low-hanging fruit for carpetbaggers in 2000. Thanks to Ross Perot's appeal and the hard work of his activists, the Party was at the turn of the century an organized network with (and here the starting gun for the political equivalent of the Oklahoma Land Rush  is fired) over $12 million in matching funds.

There were two potential candidates who had an honest claim to the nomination. Ross Perot himself declined to run. Jesse Ventura, who had made history when he was elected Governor of Minnesota as a member of the Reform Party in 1998, would also have been a legitimate contender if he had  wanted.

John Anderson, the former Republican who had run as an Independent for President in 1980 and Ron Paul the Republican who was also briefly a Libertarian when he ran for President under that banner in 1988, were also names that were bandied about as potential Reform Party nominees. Another name that had come up was Lowell Weicker, an ex-Republican who had served as Governor of Connecticut as a member of the independent Connecticut Party.

But when announcements were made there only three big names that were put forward: Donald Trump, John Hagelin, and Pat Buchanan.

Trump had been encouraged to run by Ventura. A Democrat until 1987, he had toyed with the idea of running for President as a Republican in 1988.  In 1999 Trump campaigned for the Reform Party nomination on a conservative platform but did endorse universal public health care and was more liberal on some social issues than he would be later in his political career. He said he wanted Oprah Winfrey as his running-mate. Roger Stone was his campaign director. By Feb. 2000 Ventura left the Reform Party and Trump withdrew from the race. Trump re-registered as a Democrat in 2001 and then as a Republican in 2009.

John Hagelin was running for President as the Natural Law Party nominee for the third election in a row. He was attempting to merge with the Reform Party and came close enough that his delegates from the latter party held their own convention. Unfortunately for Hagelin, the courts sided with Buchanan but that didn't stop the NLP candidate from sometimes showing up on ballots under the Reform Party label. In some states both Buchanan and Hagelin were on the ballot under the Reform Party name.

In 1992 and 1996 Ross Perot tended to avoid taking strong stands on cultural or social issues that created deep divisions among Americans. His main focus was economic. Pat Buchanan, on the other hand, had established himself as a Right wing "cultural warrior" when he ran for the Republican nomination for President in 1992 and 1996. When he began his campaign for President as a member of the Reform Party, he changed the entire premise for the existence of the organization, making it more of an affluent version of the Constitution Party in 2000. Rather than attempting to unite people with issues they had in common, Buchanan hammered away on divisive hot button social problems such as opposing abortion, Gay rights, Affirmative Action. He held views some called racist on non-white immigration. Using the slogan "America First" (which had previously been employed by fascist sympathizer, anti-Semite, white supremacist, and Holocaust denier Gerald L.K. Smith in his Presidential campaign), Buchanan offered no original ideas that were not already in the platforms of other Right wing political parties concerning foreign relations or the economy.

In spite of this he was able to elicit the support of former New Alliance Party Presidential candidate Lenora Fulani (later withdrawn) as well as future Socialist nominee Brian Moore. Klansman David Duke also hopped on board the Buchanan campaign, as well as members of the neo-Nazi National Alliance, bringing a contingent of White Nationalist support.

In New York he ran under the banner of the Right to Life Party and in Colorado under the American Party.

After considering James P. Hoffa and others, Buchanan selected Ezola Foster, one of his co-chairs from the 1996 campaign. The California-based Foster had made a name for herself as an extremely conservative African American activist. Foster was known for her views against immigration, abortion, and Gay rights. She defended the display of the Confederate flag. She said God brought slaves from Africa to America so "their descendants would know freedom." Her placement on the ticket confused several of Buchanan's more racist followers.

Foster became a controversial pick. Her membership with the John Birch Society was more than simply carrying the card, she was also part of their lecture circuit talent pool. She described the civil rights movement as a "revenge and reparations movement" and didn't think segregation was really all that bad even though she grew up in Louisiana as part of the oppressed community. Rev. Jesse Jackson and his ilk were "Leninist race-baiters" according to Foster.

Foster said "government schools," i.e. public education, were "socialist training camps." She opposed AIDS education in schools because she felt it promoted homosexuality. Foster was outspoken and hardline about illegal immigrant children. As a high school teacher she said she was persecuted for her conservative beliefs and was forced to accept worker's compensation 1996-1998 until she retired because of stress. She later said the "mental disorder" claim was faked but reporters uncovered she had suffered from depression since the 1970s and had recently been prescribed antidepressants.

The Buchanan/Foster team alienated many of the veteran Reform Party members including Perot himself. The 2000 ticket generally placed 4th around the country, behind Ralph Nader and the Greens. In Oklahoma and South Dakota they placed third but in both cases Nader was not on the ballot. There were 45 states with Foster as the VP. In Massachusetts for some reason the running-mate was William J. Higgins Sr., in Oregon no VP was apparently listed, and in Michigan Buchanan was a write-in.

Top results for Buchanan/Foster ticket: North Dakota 2.53%, Alaska 1.82%, Idaho 1.52%, Montana 1.39%, Wyoming 1.25%, Utah 1.21%, South Dakota 1.05%, Minnesota 0.91%, Louisiana-Arizona 0.81% each, Arkansas 0.80%, Nevada 0.78%, Indiana 0.77%.

On Election Day the notorious Florida "butterfly ballot" was thought to be partly responsible for taking votes away from Al Gore and giving them to Pat Buchanan.

By the 2004 election Pat Buchanan was back in the Republican camp, leaving the Reform Party in a state of wreckage. Foster ran for US Congress in 2001 as a member of the Reform Party but in 2002 joined the American Independent Party, explaining, "I'm a Constitutionalist, and it's the only party that recognizes the kingship of Jesus Christ. I'm 100% for that."

Election history:
197- - California State Assembly (Democratic) - defeated
1984 - California State Assembly (Republican) - primary - defeated
1986 - California State Assembly (Republican) - defeated
2001 - US House of Representatives (Calif.) (Reform Party of the United States of America) - defeated

Other occupations: high school teacher, author, President of Black Americans for Family Values, lecturer

Buried: Southern Nevada Veterans Memorial Cemetery (Boulder City, Nev.)

Notes:
Catholic
Winner of the 1984 and 1986 races was Maxine Waters.