Showing posts with label election of 1996. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election of 1996. Show all posts

Saturday, June 6, 2020

Muriel K. Tillinghast





Muriel K. Tillinghast, January 21, 1943 (Washington, DC) -

VP candidate for Green Party (1996)

Running mate with nominee: Ralph Nader (b. 1934)
Popular vote: 75,956 (0.08%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Using the term "Green Party" as a national political entity applied to the situation in 1996 is a bit misleading. Rather than a centralized and unified juggernaut, Ralph Nader's Presidential run in this year was not really nationally managed or coordinated in the traditional way. The Green Party of this era consisted of a confederation of local groups, some of them actually in serious conflict with each other including two groups that were in contention for the actual "Green Party" mantle.

Drafted by a confederation of groups, Ralph Nader did not swear to fight for the platform of any specific group and declared himself an independent. But he still showed up on most ballots next to a party name, usually with the word "Green" in it.

He told a Green convention that endorsed him in California in Aug. 1996:

Many Americans who call themselves liberals have so lowered their expectations about what politics can mean to this nation's future that they are settling for diminishing returns. Politics has been corrupted not just by money but by being trivialized out of addressing the great, enduring issues of who controls, who decides, who owns, who pays, who has a voice and access, and why solutions available on the shelf are not applied to the existing and looming crises of our society, both local and global.

One thing politicians do understand is rejection. When voters are deciding how they wish to use their vote, they should ask themselves how best to send a clear message. The Greens and other progressives are in the early building stages of a people-first, democratic political movement for future years. They deserve our attention because they are centering on the basic issues of representative government, one of whose purposes is to strengthen the usable tools of democracy, the other, in Thomas Jefferson's prophetic words, is "to curb the excesses of the monied interests."


Although not quite as confusing as attempting to identify Eugene McCarthy's running-mates in 1976, nailing down Nader's VP in 1996 isn't easy. His own selection was Winona LaDuke and she is generally recognized as the official person in that role. But there were stand-ins as well, such as Anne E.R. Goeke on the ballot in Iowa and Vermont, Madelyn R. Hoffman in New Jersey, and Muriel Tillinghast in New York. In Florida, where Nader was a write-in, Islara Boixados Souto was considered the running-mate.

Richard Walton (1984 Citizens Party VP) was a stand-in in Rhode Island until replaced by LaDuke. Some sources claim other stand-ins were Krista Paradise in Colorado, Bill Boteler in DC, and Deborah Howes in Oregon but I have not found any primary documents confirming those names as VPs. In a few other states Nader did not have a running-mate.

Muriel Tillinghast, Nader's VP in New York where she lived, had joined the Greens early in 1996. She had a long history as a civil rights activist dating back to the early 1960s including with SNCC operations in Mississippi. In her career she also worked with prisoners, AIDS victims, and tenants rights.

Late in the campaign she had applied for the position of Superintendent of the Syracuse, NY school system. Apparently the hiring authorities were unaware she was a VP with Nader until right before the interview (she didn't get the job).

In terms of election results, Ross Perot's entry in the contest muddies the waters a bit, but Nader still had an impressive 4th place finish with 685,435 popular votes (0.71%). He cracked over 1% in 16 states + DC. The Nader/Tillinghast ticket won 1.20% of the popular vote in the Empire State.

Election history: none

Other occupations: social activist, operations manager with Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC)

Notes:
Lutheran
Supported Obama in 2008 and Sanders in 2016.

Friday, June 5, 2020

Madelyn R. Hoffman




Madelyn R. Hoffman, November 8, 1956 (Englewood, NJ) -

VP candidate for Independent (aka Green Party) (1996)

Running mate with nominee: Ralph Nader (b. 1934)
Popular vote: 32,465 (0.03%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Using the term "Green Party" as a national political entity applied to the situation in 1996 is a bit misleading. Rather than a centralized and unified juggernaut, Ralph Nader's Presidential run in this year was not really nationally managed or coordinated in the traditional way. The Green Party of this era consisted of a confederation of local groups, some of them actually in serious conflict with each other including two groups that were in contention for the actual "Green Party" mantle.

Drafted by a confederation of groups, Ralph Nader did not swear to fight for the platform of any specific group and declared himself an independent. But he still showed up on most ballots next to a party name, usually with the word "Green" in it.

He told a Green convention that endorsed him in California in Aug. 1996:

Many Americans who call themselves liberals have so lowered their expectations about what politics can mean to this nation's future that they are settling for diminishing returns. Politics has been corrupted not just by money but by being trivialized out of addressing the great, enduring issues of who controls, who decides, who owns, who pays, who has a voice and access, and why solutions available on the shelf are not applied to the existing and looming crises of our society, both local and global.

One thing politicians do understand is rejection. When voters are deciding how they wish to use their vote, they should ask themselves how best to send a clear message. The Greens and other progressives are in the early building stages of a people-first, democratic political movement for future years. They deserve our attention because they are centering on the basic issues of representative government, one of whose purposes is to strengthen the usable tools of democracy, the other, in Thomas Jefferson's prophetic words, is "to curb the excesses of the monied interests."


Although not quite as confusing as attempting to identify Eugene McCarthy's running-mates in 1976, nailing down Nader's VP in 1996 isn't easy. His own selection was Winona LaDuke and she is generally recognized as the official person in that role. But there were stand-ins as well, such as Anne E.R. Goeke on the ballot in Iowa and Vermont, Madelyn R. Hoffman in New Jersey, and Muriel Tillinghast in New York. In Florida, where Nader was a write-in, Islara Boixados Souto was considered the running-mate.

Richard Walton (1984 Citizens Party VP) was a stand-in in Rhode Island until replaced by LaDuke. Some sources claim other stand-ins were Krista Paradise in Colorado, Bill Boteler in DC, and Deborah Howes in Oregon but I have not found any primary documents confirming those names as VPs. In a few other states Nader did not have a running-mate.

Madelyn Hoffman, Nader's running-mate in New Jersey, had worked as an environmentalist activist for almost two decades before being drafted as the VP. It appears she was not involved with the Green Party prior to 1996 but subsequently remained connected for the rest of her political career.

In terms of election results, Ross Perot's entry in the contest muddies the waters a bit, but Nader still had an impressive 4th place finish with 685,435 popular votes (0.71%). He cracked over 1% in 16 states + DC. The Nader/Hoffman ticket earned 1.06% of the popular vote in the Garden State.

Election history:
1997 - Governor of New Jersey (Green Party) - defeated
1998 - US House of Representatives (NJ) (Green Party) - defeated
2018 - US Senate (NJ) (Green Party of the United States) - defeated
2020 - US Senate (NJ) (Green Party of the United States) - pending

Other occupations: teacher, Director - Grass Roots Environmental Organization, Executive Director - New Jersey Peace Action

Notes:
Opponents in 1997 included Christine Todd Whitman (winner) and James E. McGreevey.

Thursday, June 4, 2020

Anne E.R. Goeke








Anne E.R. Goeke, January 26, 1955 (Paris, France) -

VP candidate for Green Party (aka Green Coalition) (1996)

Running mate with nominee: Ralph Nader (b. 1934)
Popular vote: 12,135 (0.01%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

Using the term "Green Party" as a national political entity applied to the situation in 1996 is a bit misleading. Rather than a centralized and unified juggernaut, Ralph Nader's Presidential run in this year was not really nationally managed or coordinated in the traditional way. The Green Party of this era consisted of a confederation of local groups, some of them actually in serious conflict with each other including two groups that were in contention for the actual "Green Party" mantle.

Drafted by a confederation of groups, Ralph Nader did not swear to fight for the platform of any specific group and declared himself an independent. But he still showed up on most ballots next to a party name, usually with the word "Green" in it.

He told a Green convention that endorsed him in California in Aug. 1996:

Many Americans who call themselves liberals have so lowered their expectations about what politics can mean to this nation's future that they are settling for diminishing returns. Politics has been corrupted not just by money but by being trivialized out of addressing the great, enduring issues of who controls, who decides, who owns, who pays, who has a voice and access, and why solutions available on the shelf are not applied to the existing and looming crises of our society, both local and global.

One thing politicians do understand is rejection. When voters are deciding how they wish to use their vote, they should ask themselves how best to send a clear message. The Greens and other progressives are in the early building stages of a people-first, democratic political movement for future years. They deserve our attention because they are centering on the basic issues of representative government, one of whose purposes is to strengthen the usable tools of democracy, the other, in Thomas Jefferson's prophetic words, is "to curb the excesses of the monied interests."


Although not quite as confusing as attempting to identify Eugene McCarthy's running-mates in 1976, nailing down Nader's VP in 1996 isn't easy. His own selection was Winona LaDuke and she is generally recognized as the official person in that role. But there were stand-ins as well, such as Anne E.R. Goeke on the ballot in Iowa and Vermont, Madelyn R. Hoffman in New Jersey, and Muriel Tillinghast in New York. In Florida, where Nader was a write-in, Islara Boixados Souto was considered the running-mate.

Richard Walton (1984 Citizens Party VP) was a stand-in in Rhode Island until replaced by LaDuke. Some sources claim other stand-ins were Krista Paradise in Colorado, Bill Boteler in DC, and Deborah Howes in Oregon but I have not found any primary documents confirming those names as VPs. In a few other states Nader did not have a running-mate.

Goeke's father was French, but mother was American. Although born in Paris, she was an American citizen and still would have been eligible to hold office in the event of a Nader/Goeke victory although no doubt there would have been a Constitutional challenge from opponents. At the time of the 1996 election, she was a Green activist in Pennsylvania. Early in the campaign season she was sometimes mentioned as the "official" running-mate.

In terms of election results, Ross Perot's entry in the contest muddies the waters a bit, but Nader still had an impressive 4th place finish with 685,435 popular votes (0.71%). He cracked over 1% in 16 states + DC. The Nader/Goeke ticket earned 2.16% of the popular vote in Vermont, and 0.53% in Iowa.

Election history:
2000 - Pennsylvania Auditor General (Green Party) - defeated

Other occupations: cofounder Women in Black (Lancaster, Penn.), cofounder Earth Rights Institute, poet, artist, activist

Notes:
She was born Anne de la Bouillerie.
Niece of actor Walter Matthau.

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

Winona LaDuke














Winona LaDuke, August 18, 1959 (Los Angeles, Calif.) - 

VP candidate for Green Party (aka Liberty Ecology Community Party aka Pacific Party aka Independent) (1996)
VP candidate for Green Party (aka DC Statehood Green Party aka Pacific Green Party aka United Citizens Party aka Progressive/Green Party aka Independent aka Association of State Green Parties) (2000)

Running mate with nominee (1996, 2000): Ralph Nader (b. 1934)
Popular vote (1996): 555,604 (0.58%)
Popular vote (2000): 2,883,443 (2.74%)
Electoral vote (1996, 2000): 0/538

The campaign (1996):

Using the term "Green Party" as a national political entity applied to the situation in 1996 is a bit misleading. Rather than a centralized and unified juggernaut, Ralph Nader's Presidential run in this year was not really nationally managed or coordinated in the traditional way. The Green Party of this era consisted of a confederation of local groups, some of them actually in serious conflict with each other including two groups that were in contention for the official "Green Party" mantle.

Drafted by several groups, Ralph Nader did not swear to fight for the platform of any specific party and declared himself an independent. But he still showed up on most ballots next to a party name, usually with the word "Green" in it.

He told a Green convention that endorsed him in California in Aug. 1996:

Many Americans who call themselves liberals have so lowered their expectations about what politics can mean to this nation's future that they are settling for diminishing returns. Politics has been corrupted not just by money but by being trivialized out of addressing the great, enduring issues of who controls, who decides, who owns, who pays, who has a voice and access, and why solutions available on the shelf are not applied to the existing and looming crises of our society, both local and global.

One thing politicians do understand is rejection. When voters are deciding how they wish to use their vote, they should ask themselves how best to send a clear message. The Greens and other progressives are in the early building stages of a people-first, democratic political movement for future years. They deserve our attention because they are centering on the basic issues of representative government, one of whose purposes is to strengthen the usable tools of democracy, the other, in Thomas Jefferson's prophetic words, is "to curb the excesses of the monied interests."


Although not quite as confusing as attempting to identify Eugene McCarthy's running-mates in 1976, nailing down Nader's VP in 1996 isn't easy. His own selection was Winona LaDuke and she is generally recognized as the official person in that role. But there were stand-ins as well, such as Anne E.R. Goeke on the ballot in Iowa and Vermont, Madelyn R. Hoffman in New Jersey, and Muriel Tillinghast in New York. In Florida, where Nader was a write-in, Islara Boixados Souto was considered the running-mate.

Richard Walton (1984 Citizens Party VP) was a stand-in in Rhode Island until replaced by LaDuke. Some sources claim other stand-ins were Krista Paradise in Colorado, Bill Boteler in DC, and Deborah Howes in Oregon but I have not found any primary documents confirming those names as VPs on the ballot. In a few other states Nader did not have a running-mate.

LaDuke, a noted environmental and indigenous activist based in Minnesota's White Earth Reservation in 1996, was on the ballot with Nader in 18 states and considered his write-in VP in a few more. Her acceptance speech after being drafted by Nader was bilingual (Ojibwe/English) and she thanked the stand-in VPs, both factoids probably being a first in the third party running-mate record books. Through her father she has some heritage from the Mississippi Band of Anishinaabe Indians.

In terms of election results, Ross Perot's entry in the contest muddies the waters a bit, but Nader still had an impressive 4th place finish with 685,435 popular votes (0.71%). He cracked over 1% in 16 states + DC. The Nader/LaDuke ticket had their top ten results were Oregon 3.59%, Alaska 3.14%, Hawaii 2.88%, Washington 2.68%, District of Columbia (where they made 3rd place) 2.57%, Maine 2.52%, New Mexico 2.38%, California 2.37%, Connecticut 1.75%, Colorado 1.66%. A bit amazing considering Nader eschewed corporate campaign donations and exhibited some slight hesitancy in his electioneering. The earlier comparison with Eugene McCarthy seems appropriate in that both candidates communicated intellect that almost totally overshadowed passion.

The campaign (2000):

Between 1996 and 2000 the Greens began to slowly build a national party under the auspices of the Association of State Green Parties. I use the term "Greens" generically since the older Greens/Green Party USA preferred to go in a different direction.

The ASGP nominated Nader and LaDuke for a second run, but this time their effort came closer to resembling a traditional campaign, posing more of a threat to the outcome of the election.

The issue that demonstrated an interesting split with the Greens concerned the Makah Indians and whaling. Located in the NW tip of the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State, the Makah were the only indigenous nation to be guaranteed whaling rights when they signed a treaty with the American government. That was in 1855. In the 1990s, after local whales were removed from the Endangered Species List, the Makah resumed whale hunting after a 70+ year hiatus. In the divisive animal protection vs. Native American treaty rights issue among the progressives, Nader and LaDuke sided with the latter although they generally supported a moratorium on commercial whaling in general.

The 2000 ticket also had the backing and shared the ballot with the DC Statehood Party, Pacific Party (Ore.), Vermont Progressive Party, and the United Citizens Party (SC).

Full disclosure. Although I voted for Clinton/Gore in 1996 I cast my ballot for Nader/LaDuke in 2000. One of my cousins in Alaska offered to trade votes. She promised to vote for Nader in a red state if I voted for Gore in what she thought was a swing state. Those kinds of deals were apparently quite frequent in 2000. I did not take her up on the offer.

Al Gore took Washington State which was not a big surprise. A bit later I was present when the Electors cast their votes for Gore in the Legislative Building in Olympia. Not long after that an earthquake measuring almost 7.0 hit Oly and that room was wrecked when giant shards of skylight glass impaled the furniture. I like to think that is a metaphor for something, but not sure what!

The popular belief is that Nader's strong showing was a spoiler and handed the election to Bush. But several political scientists dispute that claim and the controversy continues to this day. For his part, Ralph Nader was exiled from national politics and held at arm's length by once friendly establishment progressives.

On the ballot or registered write-in in all but three states, the ticket finished just short of 3% and 3 million votes, placing third. Nader/LaDuke's top ten were: Alaska 10.07%, Vermont 6.92%, Massachusetts 6.42%, Rhode Island 6.12%, Montana 5.95%, Hawaii 5.88%, Maine 5.70%, Colorado 5.25%, District of Columbia 5.24%, and Minnesota 5.20%.

In this election Winona LaDuke received more popular votes than any other female third party VP candidate in US history.

Election history:
2016 - White Earth Tribal Chair - defeated

Other occupations: executive director of Honor the Earth, industrial hemp grower, high school principal, lecturer, author, novelist, economist

Notes:
PNW trivia alert! Raised in Ashland, Ore.
Endorsed Kerry in 2004, Obama in 2008, 2012.
Washington State trivia alert!!! Bob Satiacum, a well known figure in my neck of the woods, was a
 Democratic faithless Elector in 2016 and cast his vote for Faith Spotted Eagle with LaDuke as the
 VP. Sort of funny a Faith-less Elector voted for someone named "Faith"
More WA trivia!!! LaDuke was the speaker for the The Evergreen State College graduating class of
 2014.

Monday, June 1, 2020

Joanne Marie Jorgensen









Joanne Marie Jorgensen, May 1, 1957 (Libertyville, Ill.) -

VP candidate for Libertarian Party (aka Independent) (1996)

Running mate with nominee: Harry Edson Browne (1933-2006)
Popular vote: 485,798 (0.50%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

In many ways the 1996 election had several historic landmarks for the Libertarians, starting with their Presidential nomination process. In this year they qualified for primary election status in more states than any other third party in US history up to that point. The clear winner in this chapter of election season was financial advisor and author Harry Browne. With a campaign committee that included past Presidential and VP nominees Hospers, Clark, Bergland, Nathan, and Lord, Harry Browne seemed to be the choice of the Party's establishment. There were charges that the Party itself, which is supposed to be neutral in such cases, engineered Browne's selection over more extreme, less desirable candidates in terms of appealing to mainstream voters. Accusation of conspiracies and unethical behavior by staff members were made. Although not as split as it had been in earlier years, the Libertarians went into the 1996 election bruised and battered from their own inner wars.

One of the distinguishing paradoxes about the Libertarians is that in spite of the fact the party is comprised of a vast array of individualists with conflicting concepts of ideological purity vs. political practice, the core of their official platform has changed little over the decades. Unlike the candidates from the Big Two  when I wonder where the Democratic and Republican  candidates fall in the Left/Right spectrum given the pandering and meandering vagueness of their political stances, with Libertarians on the ballot the nuances are different-- I want to find out if they are pure or practical, do they lean more toward economic, or, civil libertarianism?

Jo Jorgensen, a Party member who had run for Congress in 1992 as a Libertarian, actively campaigned for the Vice-Presidential nomination and did not appear to have any strong competition. She developed a stump speech that was repeated throughout the year: "Republican politicians give us the political equivalent of 1-900 phone sex. They tell us that we're special. They ask us what we really want— and tell us that they want it, too. Then they start breathing heavy and getting excited by what we want. They tell us their fantasy for us. They tease us and tempt us. They arouse our passions. They tell us how much they want it and how good it is going to be. When we hang up from the 1-900 Republican Tax Cut Fantasy Line, we realize three things: they cost us a lot of money, the real thing is a lot more satisfying, and they're never going to come over ... The Democrats want to increase annual spending by $55 billion. The Republicans want to up the total by $45 billion. That $10 billion dollar difference works out to 10.5 cents daily from every American. So whoever said there isn't a dime's worth of difference between Democrats and Republicans was wrong; there is a dime's difference. One dime!"

The Party wasted no time adjusting to the World Wide Web. Jorgensen kept a campaign diary that was posted on the Browne website. I found this particular entry to be insightful and of interest as it reveals a bit of the human side of campaigning and what life must be like for candidates in the same circumstances--

Thursday, October 10. I have one of my most rewarding experiences speaking before a high school class. There are two male students in the back of the room who keep asking me great questions -- questions of interest, not of skepticism.

Finally one of them, a large guy who looks like a football player (but isn't -- I asked), says, "So what you're saying is that you think that people should be able to do ANYthing they want, as long as they don't hurt anyone else?" I reply, "Yes, that's about it." He practically jumps out of his chair and exclaims, "Wow! THIS is the party for me!!"

-- (Political) Queen for a Day --
Later that evening. After my last talk in Virginia I go out to dinner with the local Libertarians and a few audience members who tag along. The menu includes both dinner and breakfast items. Even though it's dinnertime, I ask if I can order from the breakfast menu. (I rarely eat breakfast out, so I get breakfast food whenever I can .)

The waiter informs me that they only serve breakfast in the morning, so I tell him I'll be happy ordering from the dinner menu. Jokingly, the local Libertarians ask the waiter if he knows who I am and ask if he would turn down such a request from Jack Kemp. The waiter, after talking with the chef, returns and says they will be more than happy to make anything I want, anytime I want it.

I object, explaining that this is the kind of treatment I want taken away from the politicians, and that I am running to make government so small that people wouldn't have a reason to treat politicians so specially.

But the waiter insists and seems truly hurt, so I relent and order breakfast. Here is yet one more taste I get of how our elected representatives in Washington are treated like kings and queens. No wonder none of them want to leave office once elected! 


The Browne/Jorgensen ticket made the ballot in all 50 states + DC, a very impressive achievement. Ross Perot and his Reform Party plus Ralph Nader and the Green Party delegated the Libertarians to 5th place in the final results but even so the Party achieved some milestones. Browne was not a household name but he still finished with the second highest popular vote and percentage numbers in the history of the Party up that time. Jorgensen had the third highest of number of popular votes for any female third party candidate in US history, only behind Winona LaDuke of the Green Party in 1996 and 2000.

The Browne/Jorgensen ticket had their best showings in: Arizona 1.02%, Nevada 0.96%, Alaska 0.94%, New Hampshire 0.85%, Wyoming and Colorado 0.82% each, Massachusetts 0.80%, Georgia 0.78%, and Delaware 0.76%. These results were different in that they demonstrated a wider regional appeal than just the Far West as in the past.

Jo Jorgensen is now the 2020 Presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party, finally breaking the glass ceiling of that party for the top spot.

Election history:
1992 - US House of Representatives (SC) (Libertarian Party) - defeated
2020 - US President (Libertarian Party) - pending

Other occupations: academic lecturer in psychology, computer systems business

Notes:
Was on a roller hockey team.
Can fly planes.
Grew up in a conservative Republican family.
Courted by conservative Democrats to run for Congress in 1998 but apparently it did not happen.

Sunday, May 31, 2020

Robert James Meucci Sr.








Robert James Meucci Sr., October 27, 1943 -

VP candidate for Mississippi Taxpayers Party (aka US Taxpayers Party) (1996)

Running mate with nominee: Howard Jay Phillips (1941-2013)
Popular vote: 2,314 (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

The 1996 Presidential campaign for the US Taxpayers Party really begins with columnist, pundit, and speechwriter Pat Buchanan's bid for the Republican nomination. His surprisingly popular insurgent effort sounded the call for the forces of the rapidly growing hard Right and evangelical wings of the Republican Party. He called them his "Pitchfork Army" in the best of Populist demagogue traditions. Some of his critics called him "David Duke without the sheets" but the US Taxpayers Party really wanted Buchanan on their ticket and made no secret about it.

Howard Phillips, who basically was the US Taxpayers Party and had been the first Presidential nominee of the new party in 1992, watched as Buchanan gave Sen. Bob Dole a big scare early in the season but then bombed out on Super Tuesday in Mar. 1996 and suspended his campaign. This made Buchanan a free agent in the eyes of Phillips, who told a reporter, "My first choice is Pat Buchanan as an active candidate. My second choice is Pat Buchanan as an inactive candidate." The plan, if Buchanan was tied up, was to run someone else for President and still electioneer as the Party of Buchanan. Then, after they won the election, instruct the Electors to brush aside whatever name was officially in the ballot and cast their lots for Pat Buchanan.

For his part, Buchanan was playing coy and openly considered running in the third party if they gained ballot access in all 50 states (they didn't make it). He used that leverage to influence the Republican ticket, saying if Dole did not select a strong pro-life running-mate, then maybe a Party of Buchanan wouldn't be such a bad idea. Dole's subsequent selection of Rep. Jack Kemp was apparently sufficient and Buchanan came on board and endorsed the Republican ticket. So that was the end of that.

So once again the new party turned to Howard Phillips as the Presidential nominee. It would be the second of three runs for him. He described his long range plans for the US Taxpayers Party: "Our main constituencies are pro-lifers, home-schoolers and those concerned with the expansion of government. We want to establish a firm enough position so that as the Republican Party dissolves, as I believe it will, ours will be seen as an alternative."

Platform issues included: Balancing the Federal budget "immediately" -- abolishing the IRS, Dept. of Education, NEA, HUD, ATF, CIA -- Pull the US out of the UN, NATO, NAFTA, GATT -- Impose a moratorium on immigration -- Oppose abortion -- Support states' rights

Phillips opposed what he called the "Satanzation of America." He wrote, "The goal of the New World Order is to remove God from His throne and replace Him with power-seekers who desire not freedom UNDER God, but freedom FROM GOD." He also said, "My comprehensive object is to restore American jurisprudence to its biblical presuppositions and the federal government to its constitutional boundaries."

The campaign had some support from other third parties. The American Independent Party in California had become an affiliate and would remain so for the next decade. The Right to Life in New York, which had endorsed the Republicans in 1992, backed Phillips in 1996. The Concerned Citizens Party, based in Connecticut, signed on as well.

One of the stand-in running-mates was Robert J. Meucci, famous for custom cuestick design who created a much sought after artisan product. 1996 appears to have been Meucci's only foray into elective office. At the Aug. 1996 USTP convention he criticized the Democratic and Republican parties, calling the latter "a house divided against itself," and then he continued-- "And what we have here [at USTP] is not a house divided against itself but a house of all men who believe the same things about this one great nation and that is our Constitution as it was meant to be. Not as its been torn apart and broken today by the Republican and Democratic Party for the benefit of the New World Order to deliver us, America, to the New World Order, to break us down into a one world Socialist government where those who now live in cardboard boxes might some time be elevated to a wooden box, but for that to happen America must fall, must be destroyed financially. So we can level the ground. That seems to be the goal." He also lambasted the media for ignoring Phillips' campaign.

Only on the ballot in Mississippi, which is where Meucci lived at the time, the Phillips/Meucci ticket won 0.26% of the popular vote in that state.

Election history: none

Other occupations: cue sport business, cuestick designer

Notes:
Joined the USTP around early 1995.

Saturday, May 30, 2020

Samuel L. Blumenfeld








Samuel L. Blumenfeld, May 31, 1926 (New York, NY) - June 1, 2015 (Waltham, Mass.)

VP candidate for Taxpayers Party (aka US Taxpayers Party)  (1996)

Running mate with nominee: Howard Jay Phillips (1941-2013)
Popular vote: 2,204 (0.00%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

The 1996 Presidential campaign for the US Taxpayers Party really begins with columnist, pundit, and speechwriter Pat Buchanan's bid for the Republican nomination. His surprisingly popular insurgent effort sounded the call for the forces of the rapidly growing hard Right and evangelical wings of the Republican Party. He called them his "Pitchfork Army" in the best of Populist demagogue traditions. Some of his critics called him "David Duke without the sheets" but the US Taxpayers Party really wanted Buchanan on their ticket and made no secret about it.

Howard Phillips, who basically was the US Taxpayers Party and had been the first Presidential nominee of the new party in 1992, watched as Buchanan gave Sen. Bob Dole a big scare early in the season but then bombed out on Super Tuesday in Mar. 1996 and suspended his campaign. This made Buchanan a free agent in the eyes of Phillips, who told a reporter, "My first choice is Pat Buchanan as an active candidate. My second choice is Pat Buchanan as an inactive candidate." The plan, if Buchanan was tied up, was to run someone else for President and still electioneer as the Party of Buchanan. Then, after they won the election, instruct the Electors to brush aside whatever name was officially in the ballot and cast their lots for Pat Buchanan.

For his part, Buchanan was playing coy and openly considered running in the third party if they gained ballot access in all 50 states (they didn't make it). He used that leverage to influence the Republican ticket, saying if Dole did not select a strong pro-life running-mate, then maybe a Party of Buchanan wouldn't be such a bad idea. Dole's subsequent selection of Rep. Jack Kemp was apparently sufficient and Buchanan came on board and endorsed the Republican ticket. So that was the end of that.

So once again the new party turned to Howard Phillips as the Presidential nominee. It would be the second of three runs for him. He described his long range plans for the US Taxpayers Party: "Our main constituencies are pro-lifers, home-schoolers and those concerned with the expansion of government. We want to establish a firm enough position so that as the Republican Party dissolves, as I believe it will, ours will be seen as an alternative."

Platform issues included: Balancing the Federal budget "immediately" -- abolishing the IRS, Dept. of Education, NEA, HUD, ATF, CIA -- Pull the US out of the UN, NATO, NAFTA, GATT -- Impose a moratorium on immigration -- Oppose abortion -- Support states' rights

Phillips opposed what he called the "Satanzation of America." He wrote, "The goal of the New World Order is to remove God from His throne and replace Him with power-seekers who desire not freedom UNDER God, but freedom FROM GOD." He also said, "My comprehensive object is to restore American jurisprudence to its biblical presuppositions and the federal government to its constitutional boundaries."

The campaign had some support from other third parties. The American Independent Party in California had become an affiliate and would remain so for the next decade. The Right to Life in New York, which had endorsed the Republicans in 1992, backed Phillips in 1996. The Concerned Citizens Party, based in Connecticut, signed on as well.

In Kentucky only, Phillips' stand-in running-mate was Samuel Blumenfeld. Blumenfeld was a critic of the American educational system and was an early activist in the home school movement.

Blumenfeld had the kind of conservative credentials that epitomized the USTP. He was a staunch anti-communist connected with the John Birch Society and co-founded the spinoff group Jewish Society of Americanists. He doubted the theories of Darwin, embraced the anti-vaccination movement, and railed against globalism and the "New World Order."

In 2004, Blumenfeld reflected on the USTP and the 1996 campaign: "The Taxpayers Party had its great moment back in 1996, when there was the chance that Patrick Buchanan would bolt the Republican Party and become the Presidential candidate of the Taxpayers Party. In fact, both the conventions of the Republican Party and the Taxpayers Party took place in San Diego at the same time, which made it easy for Buchanan to make his dramatic move and switch parties had he wanted to. But he didn't. And so the great opportunity to put the Taxpayers Party on the front pages of America came and went. Buchanan didn't want to be blamed for a Dole defeat. In the end, the lackluster, non-charismatic, erectile dysfunctional Dole was beaten by the charming, sexy (and erectile functional) Bill Clinton."

The Phillips/Blumenfeld ticket took 0.16% of the popular vote in the Bluegrass State.

Election history: none

Other occupations: US Army (WWII), author, editor, teacher, lecturer, publisher, poet, radio host

Buried: Massachusetts National Cemetery (Bourne, Mass.)

Notes:
Parents and older siblings came to the US from Poland.
Was pro-Marlowe in the Shakespeare authorship question.
Supported Goldwater in 1964.
"You don't need puppets popping out of trash cans to teach children how to read"--Samuel L.
 Blumenfeld.
This brief profile was posted one day before what would have been Blumenfeld's 94th birthday.

Friday, May 29, 2020

Joseph A. Zdonczyk









Joseph A. Zdonczyk, November 2, 1928 (Waterbury, Conn.) - February 19, 2008 (Wolcott, Conn.)

VP candidate for US Taxpayers Party (aka Concerned Citizens Party) (1996)

Running mate with nominee: Howard Jay Phillips (1941-2013)
Popular vote: 10,031 (0.01%)
Electoral vote: 0/538

The campaign:

The 1996 Presidential campaign for the US Taxpayers Party really begins with columnist, pundit, and speechwriter Pat Buchanan's bid for the Republican nomination. His surprisingly popular insurgent effort sounded the call for the forces of the rapidly growing hard Right and evangelical wings of the Republican Party. He called them his "Pitchfork Army" in the best of Populist demagogue traditions. Some of his critics called him "David Duke without the sheets" but the US Taxpayers Party really wanted Buchanan on their ticket and made no secret about it.

Howard Phillips, who basically was the US Taxpayers Party and had been the first Presidential nominee of the new party in 1992, watched as Buchanan gave Sen. Bob Dole a big scare early in the season but then bombed out on Super Tuesday in Mar. 1996 and suspended his campaign. This made Buchanan a free agent in the eyes of Phillips, who told a reporter, "My first choice is Pat Buchanan as an active candidate. My second choice is Pat Buchanan as an inactive candidate." The plan, if Buchanan was tied up, was to run someone else for President and still electioneer as the Party of Buchanan. Then, after they won the election, instruct the Electors to brush aside whatever name was officially in the ballot and cast their lots for Pat Buchanan.

For his part, Buchanan was playing coy and openly considered running in the third party if they gained ballot access in all 50 states (they didn't make it). He used that leverage to influence the Republican ticket, saying if Dole did not select a strong pro-life running-mate, then maybe a Party of Buchanan wouldn't be such a bad idea. Dole's subsequent selection of Rep. Jack Kemp was apparently sufficient and Buchanan came on board and endorsed the Republican ticket. So that was the end of that.

So once again the new party turned to Howard Phillips as the Presidential nominee. It would be the second of three runs for him. He described his long range plans for the US Taxpayers Party: "Our main constituencies are pro-lifers, home-schoolers and those concerned with the expansion of government. We want to establish a firm enough position so that as the Republican Party dissolves, as I believe it will, ours will be seen as an alternative."

Platform issues included: Balancing the Federal budget "immediately" -- abolishing the IRS, Dept. of Education, NEA, HUD, ATF, CIA -- Pull the US out of the UN, NATO, NAFTA, GATT -- Impose a moratorium on immigration -- Oppose abortion -- Support states' rights

Phillips opposed what he called the "Satanzation of America." He wrote, "The goal of the New World Order is to remove God from His throne and replace Him with power-seekers who desire not freedom UNDER God, but freedom FROM GOD." He also said, "My comprehensive object is to restore American jurisprudence to its biblical presuppositions and the federal government to its constitutional boundaries."

The campaign had some support from other third parties. The American Independent Party in California had become an affiliate and would remain so for the next decade. The Right to Life in New York, which had endorsed the Republicans in 1992, backed Phillips in 1996. The Concerned Citizens Party, based in Connecticut, signed on as well. The latter party was founded in 1975 by Joseph A. Zdoncyzk of Wolcott, Conn.

Zdonczyk was the USTP stand-in VP in Connecticut and Illinois. He at one time had studied to be a Catholic priest, and when he entered politics one of his priorities was opposing abortion. Although he opposed capital punishment he was generally a fiscal and social conservative and was a perennial candidate in local and state elections.

The Concerned Citizens Party seems to have had it's origins as a rallying point for residents of Wolcott, Conn. concerning land use issues after having no results from the Democratic Party local officials. In fact, the group was initially called Concerned Citizens for a Better Wolcott.

It appears the CCP became an affiliate of the USTP only shortly before the 1996 election. The CCP pretty much died with Zdonczyk when he passed away in 2008.

The Phillips/Zdonczyk ticket captured 0.17% of the popular vote in Connecticut and 0.18% in Illinois.

Election history:
1974 - Connecticut State House (Democratic) - primary - defeated
1975 - Mayor of Wolcott, Conn. (Concerned Citizens for a Better Wolcott) - defeated
1977 - Mayor of Wolcott, Conn. (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
1979 - Mayor of Wolcott, Conn. (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
1985 - Mayor of Wolcott, Conn. (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
1987 - Wolcott (Conn.) Board of Education (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
1990 - Governor of Connecticut (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
1991 - Wolcott (Conn.) Treasurer (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
1994 - Governor of Connecticut (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
1998 - Governor of Connecticut (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
2000 - US House of Representatives (Conn.) (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
2002 - US House of Representatives (Conn.) (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
2004 - Connecticut State House (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
2006 - Governor of Connecticut (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated
2007 - Mayor of Waterbury, Conn. (Concerned Citizens Party) - defeated

Other occupations: US Army, amusement and vending machine company owner,

Buried: Calvary Cemetery (Waterbury, Conn.)

Notes:
Winner of the 1900 election was Lowell Weicker, also running third party.
Said he went to church daily.
Both parents were Polish immigrants.